Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1118 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/11/2011 in Appeal No. 1563/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. IASE DEEMED UNIVERSITYGandhi Vidhya Mandir,Sardarshahar, through its Registrar,Shri Mohan LalC...
Case Number: 1118
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4101 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 31/03/2011 in Appeal No. 76/2008 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. K.M. SENTHILKUMARUniversity of Madras ChepaukChennai - 600 005Tamil Nadu...........Petitioner...
Case Number: 4101
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Mohan Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.S.KALKURA
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/10/545(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/07/2010 in Case No. CCNO.120/2009 of District Palakkad)1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUTREGISTRAR,UNIVERSITY OF CALICUTKOZHIKKODEKERALA...........Appell...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
University Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AJAY DIGPAUL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2012 IN RP/79/20121. REGISTRAR, GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RAJESH SHARMA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRES...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2012
University Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AJAY DIGPAUL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2012 IN RP/80/20121. REGISTRAR, GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MANAN CHOPRA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRESI...
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2012
University Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AJAY DIGPAUL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2012 IN RP/81/20121. REGISTRAR, GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. LOVEKESH KUMAR SHARMA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUP...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2012
University Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AJAY DIGPAUL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2012 IN RP/82/20121. REGISTRAR, GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RISHAB AJMANI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRES...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2012
University Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AJAY DIGPAUL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2012 IN RP/83/20121. REGISTRAR, GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SARABJIT SINGH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRE...
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.