Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ANISH DAYAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 15 OF 20021. PARMESHWAR SHARAN MATHUR & ANR.S/O. LATE SHRI JAGDISH SHARNA MATHUR R/O. MOHALLA KHATRANASHIKOKHABAD - 205 135DISTT. FIROZABAD U.P............Complainant(s)Versus1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, ALIGAR...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2002
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 673 OF 2012 IN CC/116/20121. KM. RAMA WALIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. VICE CHANCELLOR, CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J....
Case Number: 673
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S. A. KRANTHI KUMAR REDDY
Respondant Advocate M.S.SRINIVASA IYENGAR FOR OP 1 & OP3
Complaint Case No. CC/69/20101. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF LEGAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF LAWNALSAR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S.BLUE DART EXPRESS LTD1-8-450/1/A/159 AND 160,PRAKASH NAGAR, BEGUMPET, SECUNDERABAD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PR...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S. A. KRANTHI KUMAR REDDY
Respondant Advocate M.S.SRINIVASA IYENGAR FOR OP 1 & OP3
Complaint Case No. CC/69/20101. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF LEGAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF LAWNALSAR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S.BLUE DART EXPRESS LTD1-8-450/1/A/159 AND 160,PRAKASH NAGAR, BEGUMPET, SECUNDERABAD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PR...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3918 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 28/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1484/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DEEPAK SONIS/o Sh Ram Niwas SOni, R/o 266 Old HB Colony, BhiwaniBhiwaniHaryana...........Petit...
Case Number: 3918
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADAN PUNAMCHAND PARDESHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2274 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/02/2012 in Appeal No. 367/2010&379/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. ROSHAN MADAN PARDESHIR/o Kharewada, Khalache Gai Shirpur Tq ShirpurDhuleMaharastra....
Case Number: 2274
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-09-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. SURESHAN
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJESH GUPTA & MR. HARPREET SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 102 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 27/01/2006 in Complaint No. 44/2002 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. MADHAVAN MALANKAD AND ORS.KRISHNA KRIPA , OPP. POST OFFICE ROAD , POST VIDYANAGAR , KASARAGOD-3 KERELA ...
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2006
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
University Institute Education
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 546 OF 2012 IN TA/25/20111. INSTITUTE OF ADVANCE STUDIES IN EDUCATION UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SUNIL KUMAR & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHO...
Case Number: 546
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMOL B. KARANDE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2793 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/06/2011 in Appeal No. 1019/2006 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. JOINT SECRETARY / REGISTRAR, NORTH MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITYNorth Maharastra University, Jalga...
Case Number: 2793
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. BEENASHAW N. SONI
Respondant Advocate MR. RAM SINGH CHOUDHARY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3128 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/08/2007 in Appeal No. 1295/2006 of the State Commission Delhi)1. UNIVERSITY OF DELHITHROUGH ITS REGISTRAR , UNIVERSITY OF DELHI DELH - 110 007...........Petitio...
Case Number: 3128
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2007
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.