Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 669 OF 2012 IN RP/3918/20111. DEEPAK SONI...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DIRECTOR OF DISTANCE EDUCATION GURU JAMBHESHWAR UNIVERSITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUST...
Case Number: 669
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-01-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s V.Chaitanya latha
Respondant Advocate M/s A.Venkatesh
First Appeal No. FA/845/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. cc/24/2009 of District Hyderabad-II)1. M.Krishna Rao S/o M.Godavari, 58 yrs., Occ: Rtd., Bank Manager, 48-7-47, First floor, Srinagar, Ramatalkies side market road, Visakapatnam...........Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 845
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 639
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. CHITRA SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MS. REENA PODDAR & MR. GAUTAM RARIA (AUTH. REP.)
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 833-837 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 08/01/2008 in Appeal No. 192/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RAI UNIVERSITY (ERSTWHILE) & ANR.DWARKA CAMPAUS, NEXT TO NIRMAL DHAM, VILLAGE CHAWLA DWARKA, P...
Case Number: 833
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2012
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/12/1571. T. VijayanGovt School for the Visually Handicapped, Vazhuthacaud...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Controller of Examination, Kerala University and AnotherTrivandrum2....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V.P. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1576 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/05/2011 in Appeal No. 2366/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITYThrough Vice ChancellorAgraU.P2. Principal (Examination Cood...
Case Number: 1576
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHOK KUMAR SAINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 362 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 25/11/2011 in Appeal No. 1492/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. SHRI RAM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT70 K.M Stone , Delhi Mathura Road,P.O Aurangab...
Case Number: 1731
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. B. SUBRAHMANYA PRASAD & H.CHANDRA SEKHAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 694 OF 2012 IN RP/3388/20101. REGISTRAR OF MANIPAL UNIVERSITY & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. DR. SUSHITH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING M...
Case Number: 694
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. A.R.N. & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate Mr. B.P. Sahu
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3842 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 02/07/2011 in Appeal No. 6/2009 of the State Commission Manipur)1. THOKCHOM RAJSHREED/o Th Mani Singh, R/o Keishampat Thokchom Leikai, P.O and P.S ImphalImphal West...
Case Number: 3842
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2012
University Institute Education
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI TRANSFER APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 20111. INSTITUTE OF ADVANCE STUDIES IN EDUCATION UNIVERSITYGandhi Vidhya Mandhir, Sardarshar,ChuruRajasthan...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SUNIL KUMAR & ORS.R/o Village,Parli Paryal.P.O Samou...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.