company-name-logo

University

Latest Judgments

Total 1719 Consumer Court Cases Against University.

Madhya Pradesh

DAPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION & SPORTS SCIENCE AWADESH PRATAP SINGH UNIVERSITY V/S SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEY

University   Education   Sports  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate SANTOSH MISHRA

Respondant Advocate SUSHIL TIWARI

Case Number: 301

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2017

Madhya Pradesh

DEPARTMENT PHYSICAL EDUCATION & SPORTS SCIENCE AWADESH PRATAP UNIVERSITY V/S ARIVENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA

University   Education   Sports  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate SANTOSH MISHRA

Respondant Advocate SUSHIL TIWARI

Case Number: 302

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2017

NCDRC

KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY & ANR. V/S SHEENAM

University   Kurukshetra University  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. JAWAHAR NARANG

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4626 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/07/2012 in Appeal No. 571/2012 & 592/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SHEENAMD/o Sh.Shyam Singh, R/o House No-1466-A Jyoti NagarKURKSHETRAHARYANA............

Case Number: 4626

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2013

Madhya Pradesh

KULSACHUB AWADHESH PRATAP SINGH UNIVERSITY V/S SIRVESH KUMAR GUPTA

University  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate MANINANDRA DWEVEDI

Respondant Advocate PANKAJ MISHRA

Case Number: 272

|

Date of Filing: 07-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2017

NCDRC

BISHALAKSHMI PAUL CHOUDHURY & ANR. V/S ASSAM UNIVERSITY (CENTRAL UNIVERSITY) & 3 ORS.

University  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. J. P. SHARMA & MR. H.N. MUKHERJEE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3843 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/08/2012 in Appeal No. 13/2008&72/2012 of the State Commission Assam)1. ASSAM UNIVERSITY (CENTRAL UNIVERSITY) & 3 ORS.Dorgakona SilcharCacharAssam2. The Vice Chac...

Case Number: 3843

|

Date of Filing: 08-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-01-2013

Kerala

COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY V/S SRIRAGH KARAT

University  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate MADHAVAN UNNI

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/11/4741. SRIRAGH KARATSREEDHARA VIHAR, PUTHUR, PALAKKAD 678 001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYREP. BY THE REGISTRAR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, K...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

The Registrar, MAHE University V/S Shankara Poojary

University  

Court Name: Udupi

Appelant Advocate Sri S.A

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2019

Punjab

Guru kashi university V/S Sukhcharan singh

University  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate S.S.Sandhu

Respondant Advocate

DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/5251. Sukhcharan singhson of Jagraj singh r/o ward No.12,Maur ;mandi,talwandi sabo,district Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Guru...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 15-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

KUL SACHIV JIWAJI UNIVERSITY V/S KU. MEENU CHAUDHARY

University  

Court Name: Bhind

Appelant Advocate MAHAVEER SINGH KUSHWAH

Respondant Advocate O.P.MATHUR

Case Number: 188

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-05-2016

Madhya Pradesh

JIWAJI UNIVERSITY V/S RUDRA PRATAP SINGH

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2008

|

Date of Upload: 24-02-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.