company-name-logo

University

Latest Judgments

Total 1719 Consumer Court Cases Against University.

Madhya Pradesh

ORIENTAL UNIVERSITY V/S ASHWIN UPADHYAY

University  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 68

|

Date of Filing: 29-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 15-04-2016

Kerala

Vinayaka Mission University V/S Dr Rajan Simon James

University  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate S. Balachandran Kulasekharam

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/12/72.1. Dr Rajan Simon JamesKowdiar, TVPM BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sri G. Sivaprasad PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Smt. Beena Kumari. A MemberHON'BLE MRS. Smt. S.K.Sreela Member PR...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Bihar

Case Number: 136

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 03-03-2021

Madhya Pradesh

BHOJ UNIVERSITY V/S PREMDAS

University  

Court Name: Mandsaur

Appelant Advocate SHIVRAMAN SINGH PANWAR

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 37

|

Date of Filing: 02-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 03-05-2016

Madhya Pradesh

punjab technology university V/S Ashok Kumar mishra

University  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-02-2016

Maharashtra

MISS TANUSHREE SARKAR BRANCH HEAD THE ICFAT UNIVERSITY TRIPURA V/S SWAPNIL SATISH CHIDREWAR

University  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/2801. SWAPNIL SATISH CHIDREWARFLAT NO C-O5,SAISAYAJI NAGAR WARJE PUNE 58PUNEMAHA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MISS TANUSHREE SARKAR BRANCH HEAD THE ICFAT UNIVERSITY TRIPURA VIMANNAGAR.PUNEPUNEMAHA2. DR.SATENDRA P GUPTA,REGISTRAR THE IFAT UNIVERSITY TR...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

SHIKHA JAIN AND ORS. V/S DISTANCE EDUCATION NARENDER DEV UNIVERSITY

University   Education  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND PRAKASH & MS. BABITA SETH

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 252 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 29/11/2006 in Appeal No. 764/2006 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DISTANCE EDUCATION NARENDER DEV UNIVERSITYACHARY NARENDEAR DEV UNIVERSITY FAIZABAD THROUGH ...

Case Number: 252

|

Date of Filing: 23-01-2007

|

Date of Upload: 28-01-2013

Kerala

Vinayaka Mission University V/S K Sivasankaran Nair

University  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate S Balachandran Kulasekharam

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/12/0711. K Sivasankaran NairSathi havan , Vattiyoorkkavu BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sri G. Sivaprasad PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Smt. Beena Kumari. A MemberHON'BLE MRS. Smt. S.K.Sre...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

State Bank of India through its Chief Manager, Sector-14, Punjab University Branch Chandigarh V/S Ramesh Chandra Singh

State Bank Of India   State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India   University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. Gagandeep Goel Adv. for the appellant

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/437/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Ramesh Chandra SinghC/o Nidhi Rakesh Singh, House No.A-107, Ground Floor, Block-A, Tagore Garden Extn. New Delhi-110027...........Appellant(s)Versus1. State Bank of India through its Chief Man...

Case Number: 437

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

SANCHALK PHYSICAL,EDUCTIONAL AND SCIENCE DEPERTEMENT AWADESH PRATAP SINGH UNIVERSITY V/S UMESH PATAHAK

University  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate SANTOSH MISHRA

Respondant Advocate SUSHIL TIWARI

Case Number: 299

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.