University
Latest Judgments
Total 1719 Consumer Court Cases Against University.
Director Regional Office M.P Bhoj Open University Bhopal V/S Mr. Sanjay Malti
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2021
ABHINAV AGGARWAL & ORS. V/S PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
University Punjab Technical University
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHWANI KUMAR SOOD
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1955 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 13/03/2008 in Appeal No. 668/2007 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY LADOWALI ROAD, ADJOINING B. ED. COLLEGE, JALANDHAR, PUNJAB.........
Case Number: 1955
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2013
Bangalore University and Others V/S Kum. Rekha D
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2192
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2022
REGISTRAR, GURU GOBING SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR. V/S JUPNIT KAUR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2300 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/02/2013 in Appeal No. 405/2011 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/4565/20131. JUPNIT KAURB-1/511 JANAKPURI, DIST CENTRENEW DELHI - 110058...........Petition...
Case Number: 2300
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2013
M/s Vodafone Cellular Limited, 4th Floor Angels Arcade, Kalamassery, Cochin University Post, V/S T.V. Ashok, Dwaraka, Onivayal, Kalpetta
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/30/20131. T.V. Ashok, Dwaraka, Onivayal, Kalpetta673121WayanadKerala............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Vodafone Cellular Limited, 4th Floor Angels Arcade, Kalamassery, Cochin University Post,Cochin 682022Ernakulam.Kerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HO...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SHIKHA JAIN AND ORS. V/S DISTANCE EDUCATION NARENDER DEV UNIVERSITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND PRAKASH & MS. BABITA SETH
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2013 IN RP/252/20071. DISTANCE EDUCATION NARENDER DEV UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SHIKHA JAIN AND ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA,...
Case Number: 114
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2013
Gahininath Namdeo Gaikwad V/S Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate k.m. Surawanshy
Respondant Advocate
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. FA/07/379(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada UniversityAurangabad............Appellant(s)Versus1. Gahininath ...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M.P. Bhoj University V/S Dharamveer Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2016
HIRALAL PUNAMCHAND PARDESHI & 3 ORS. V/S JOINT SECRETARY / REGISTRAR, NORTH MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMOL B. KARANDE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2013 IN RP/2793/20121. JOINT SECRETARY / REGISTRAR, NORTH MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HIRALAL PUNAMCHAND PARDESHI & 3 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbs...
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2013
DR. SUSHITH V/S REGISTRAR OF MANIPAL UNIVERSITY & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. B. SUBRAHMANYA PRASAD & H.CHANDRA SEKHAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 115 OF 2013 IN RP/3388/20101. REGISTRAR OF MANIPAL UNIVERSITY & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. DR. SUSHITH...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING M...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.