company-name-logo

University

Latest Judgments

Total 1719 Consumer Court Cases Against University.

Maharashtra

Rai University V/S Nikhil M.Nahar

University  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Execution Application No. EA/12/421. Nikhil M.NaharSinhagad Road,Pune PuneMaha...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Rai UniversityNew DelhiDelhiDelhi...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MS. Geeta S.Ghatge MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERद्वारा �...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Rai University V/S Ms.Swati Choudhari

University  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Execution Application No. EA/12/431. Ms.Swati ChoudhariMudhawa Pune 36PuneMaha...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Rai UniversityNew DelhiDelhiDelhi...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. V. P. UTPAT PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MS. Geeta S.Ghatge MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERद्वारा �...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

DR. A.S. PARASHIVA MURTHY V/S UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES EMPLOYEES' HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERTIVE SOCIETY LTD.

University   Society   University Of Agricultural Sciences  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHARAN DEV SINGH THAKUR

Respondant Advocate MR. DEVADATT KAMAT

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2383 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/04/2011 in Appeal No. 2163/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES EMPLOYEES' HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERTIVE SOCIETY LTD.Employ...

Case Number: 2383

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 03-04-2014

Rajasthan

University Of Rajasthan V/S Nitin Jain

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shashank Sharma

Respondant Advocate Ashok Sharma,Pooja Choudhary

Case Number: 1237

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2015

West Bengal

VICE CHANCELLOR, PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY V/S DR. TUFAN NAIYA

University  

Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/253/2013 1. DR. TUFAN NAIYAVILL. & P.O. DHOSA, DIST. SOUTH 24 PGS. PIN-743337SOUTH 24 PGS.WEST BENGAL ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. VICE CHANCELLOR, PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY86/1, COLLGE STREET, P.S....

Case Number: 253

|

Date of Filing: 14-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

GOPAL MISHRA V/S JIWAJI UNIVERSITY

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH.N.SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2009

|

Date of Upload: 17-10-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Principal Madhya Pradesh Bhoj Open University Bhopal V/S Manish Kumar Patel

University  

Court Name: Hoshangabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 166

|

Date of Filing: 22-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2016

Karnataka

The Registrar,Madurai Kamaraj University V/S Ms. Sweety Srivastava

University  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/14/4181. Ms. Sweety SrivastavaC/o Puskar Sahay No.141,1st Floor,2nd Main Road Balaji Layout,MyLasandra, Behind G...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

SHIKHA JAIN AND ORS. V/S DISTANCE EDUCATION NARENDER DEV UNIVERSITY

University   Education  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND PRAKASH & MS. BABITA SETH

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 252 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 29/11/2006 in Appeal No. 764/2006 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DISTANCE EDUCATION NARENDER DEV UNIVERSITYACHARY NARENDEAR DEV UNIVERSITY FAIZABAD THROUGH ...

Case Number: 252

|

Date of Filing: 23-01-2007

|

Date of Upload: 11-03-2014

Jharkhand

Ranchi University Through Registrar V/S Praveen Kumar Mishra

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.