University
Latest Judgments
Total 1728 Consumer Court Cases Against University.
Rabindra Bharati University Directorate of Distance Education V/S Ms. Mousumi Das D/o. Sri Sunil Das
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 610
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2015
R. PAVITHRA V/S VICE CHANCELLOR, SHANMUGA ARTS, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH ACADEMY, (SASTRA) DEEMED UNIVERSITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. G.R. ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4495 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 07/08/2013 in Appeal No. 328/2012 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu) WITH IA/7333/20131. VICE CHANCELLOR, SHANMUGA ARTS, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH ACADEMY,...
Case Number: 4495
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-11-2014
CHAIRMAIN, IIITM UNIVERSITY V/S SUSHMITA SINGH
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate Shri AVADESH KU. SONI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 472
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2016
APG shimla University V/S Jashanpreet singh
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.Ajay Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/1011. Jashanpreet singhson of sh. Surinderpal singh r/o House Multania road, No.2/1, Near Punjab Home Guard Office, Bathinda-...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Rabindra Bharati University Directorate of Distance Education V/S Smt. Priyanka Saha D/o. Sri Sibeswar Saha
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 601
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2015
Ever Green Motors V/S Registrar Kota University
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Hemant Krishna Vijay vergiya
Respondant Advocate Sandeep Jain
Case Disposed Off & Dismiss....
Case Number: 101
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2018
Rabindra Bharati University Directorate of Distance Education V/S Ms. Jayati Roy Chowdhury D/o. Sisir Roy Chowdhury
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 599
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2015
Rabindra Bharati University Directorate of Distance Education V/S Sri Sanjib Biswas S/o. Sudhir Biswas
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DCDRF North 24 Paraganas BarasatKolkata-700126.Complaint Case No. CC/600/20141. Sri Sanjib Biswas S/o. Sudhir Biswas Vill & P.O.-Taraknagar, Dist-Nadia, Pin-741502 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Rabindra Bharati University Directorate of Distance EducationRabindra Bhavan, EE-9...
Case Number: 600
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2015
SRIRAGH KARAT V/S COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A ABDUL KHARIM
Respondant Advocate -
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALCOMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO.397/2013 JUDGMENT DATED 20/10/2014(Appeal filed against the order in CC No.474/2011 on the file of CDRF, Ernakulam dated 31/12/2012)PRESENT:SMT. A. RADHA : MEMBERSHRI. K. CHANDRADAS NADA...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
RASHMIKANTA MISHRA V/S SAMBALPUR UNIVERSITY & 2 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BHAGABATI PRASAD PADHY
Respondant Advocate MS. NANDINI SHARMA,
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 356 OF 2014 IN RP/2307/20131. SAMBALPUR UNIVERSITY & 2 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. RASHMIKANTA MISHRA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING...
Case Number: 356
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.