Court Name: Jaipur-IV
Appelant Advocate Mudit Upadhyaya
Respondant Advocate
जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष मंच, जयपुर चतुर्थ, जयपुर पीठासीन अधिकारी डाॅ. चन्द्रिका प्रसाद शर्मा, अध्यक�...
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2015
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate SANJEEV VYAS
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/633/20141. DEEPESH K DAVEJODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. VARDHMAN OPEN UNIVERSITYKOTA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES SATYA DEO TAK PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. ZUBEDA QUADRI MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERफा...
Case Number: 633
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2015
University Karnataka State Open University
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/375/2012( Date of Filing : 09 Aug 2012 )1. Karnataka Consumers Forum (Reg.)...
Case Number: 375
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2020
Court Name: Ajmer
Appelant Advocate ADV GULJEET SINGH
Respondant Advocate ADV ASHOK AGARWAL
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/471/20131. VIDYAWATI AJMER BEFORE: Gautam prakesh sharma PRESIDENT vijendra kumar mehta MEMBER Jyoti Dosi MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERजिला मंच, उपभोक्ता संरक्षण अ...
Case Number: 471
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate SUNIL MUDGIL
Respondant Advocate R.L. SINGLA
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.96 of 2014 Instituted on:7.4.2014 Date of order:15.06.2015Poonam Singh d/o Lal Singh, r/o B-111, National Fertilizers Ltd. Township GT road, Panipat. …….Complainant VERSUS1.Deen Bandhu Chh...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-06-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3146 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/07/2012 in Appeal No. 201/2012 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/1206/2013,IA/5145/20141. SANJAY KUMAR MISHRAH.No-1224, GF New HBC.Sector-19 Panchkula...
Case Number: 2806
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-01-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Miss Seema Jain
Respondant Advocate Neeraj Jain
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.479 of 2013 Instituted on:29.11.2013 Date of order:10.06.2015Namrta d/o Rajender Singh and wife of Punit, resident of Sugar Mills, Sonepat. …….Complainant VERSUS1.PM Engineering College th...
Case Number: 479
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-06-2015
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/12/92InComplaint Case No. CC/08/1931. N.BalagopalSarika,Elanjimoodu,Kumarapuram...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Vinayaka mission UniversitySalem,TN...........Respondent(...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Vadodara
Appelant Advocate G.K.BUMIYA
Respondant Advocate
CDRF VADODARA MAINANAND NAGAR,KARELIBAUG,VADODARAComplaint Case No. CC/14/8681. VISHAL HEMANT KUMAR TRIVEDIVADODARA BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE P.O.LAD PRESIDENT MRS. VANDANA BHATT MEMBER MRS. KAMAL P. SHAH MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERDISPOSED OFF [HON'AB...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHEKHAR GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4118 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/10/2011 in Appeal No. 884/2010 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SVKM'S NMIMS UNIVERSITYHaving its Office at:- VL Mehta Road, Vile Parle (West) Mumbai - 400 ...
Case Number: 4118
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.