company-name-logo

University

Latest Judgments

Total 1719 Consumer Court Cases Against University.

Rajasthan

Jaipur Natiosnal University through Director V/S Rambabu Sharma s/o Badrinarian Sharma

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate H.S.Mahala

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 740 /2015Rambabu Sharma s/o Badrinarayan Sharma r/o Plot no. 75/255 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur.Vs.Jaipur National University,Jaipur main campus,Jagatpura, Jaipur.Date of Order 11.3.2...

Case Number: 740

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2016

Haryana

The Registar Maharishi Dayanand University V/S Dinesh S/o Ram Mehar

University  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Vijay Vashista

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 480

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2016

Uttarakhand

Graphics Era University V/S Aditya Dav Thapiyal

University  

Court Name: Dehradun

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 32

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 04-03-2016

Punjab

Punjab Technical University V/S Sanjeev Verma

University   Punjab Technical University  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh. Lakhbinder Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2016

Punjab

The Vice Chancellor Baba Farid University V/S Rashmi

University  

Court Name: Faridkot

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTComplaint No. : 51Date of Institution: 17.02.2015Date of Decision : 25.02.2016Rashmi d/o Sh Sham Sunder C-85, New Cantt Road, Faridkot....ComplainantVersusThe Vice Chancellor, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Sadiq Road...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

LLb professional university V/S arushi

University  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 26-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2016

Karnataka

Register Bengaluru University V/S Kamal N. Sudan

University  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate in person

Respondant Advocate

BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/15/17321. Kamal N. Sudan1442, wazir Nagar, Kotha Mubarak pur, New Delhi-003............Complainant(s)Versus1. Register Bengaluru University Jnana Bharathi Cam...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 15-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2016

Jharkhand

Mr. Arun Kumar V/S The Registrar Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

University   Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. R.K. Sinha

Respondant Advocate In Person

Case Number: 178

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2016

Maharashtra

REGISTRAR, MADURAI KAMRAJ UNIVERSITY V/S PRAKASH PANDURANG KATKE

University  

Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 29

|

Date of Filing: 02-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-02-2016

Karnataka

Mysore University Employees House Building Co-operative Society Ltd., V/S Smt.T.Prema, W/o.Sri.K.B.Anand,

University   Co-operative Society   Society  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate Sri.S.Shankar

Respondant Advocate Syed Amjad

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/259/20151. Smt.T.Prema, W/o.Sri.K.B.Anand,working as Stenographer at DST-PU...

Case Number: 259

|

Date of Filing: 17-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 12-02-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.