company-name-logo

University

Latest Judgments

Total 1719 Consumer Court Cases Against University.

Delhi

GURU GOBIND SINGH UNIVERSITY V/S JUPNIT KAUR

University  

Court Name: West Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, JanakPuri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution 21.8.13 Case. No.520 /13 Date of order: 21.9.16In the matter ofJupnit Kaur,B-1/511, Janak PuriNew Delhi-58. COMPLAINANTV...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2003

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2016

Karnataka

The Branch Manager,LIC Of India V/S Devendrappa Madrikar FDA Gulbarga University

University  

Court Name: Gulbarga

Appelant Advocate Mohan E Charma

Respondant Advocate Mallikarjun V.Ghooli

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOPPOSITE PRAGATI KRISHNA GRAMIN BANK RAJAPUR KUSHNUR ROAD KALABURAGIComplaint Case No. CC/15/471. Devendrappa Madrikar FDA Gulbarga UniversityAge : Major,R/o.Gulbarga University,KalaburgiKalaburagiKarnataka...........Complainan...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2017

Punjab

St. Peters University V/S Rachhpal Singh

University  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate Sh. Alwinder Mohan Goyal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMMANSAPUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/16/1881. Rachhpal SinghS/o Sukhdev Singh R/o Village Khiala Kalan Tehsil MansaMansaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. St. Peters University Avadi Chennai through its Registrar.Tamil Nadu............Op...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2016

Karnataka

The Manager, Agricultural University V/S Chandrashekhar S/o Shivalingappa Siddareddy

University  

Court Name: Koppal

Appelant Advocate M.A.Umachagi,

Respondant Advocate V M Bhusnurmath

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-09-2016

Rajasthan

JAIPUR NATIONAL UNIVERSITY V/S ROHIT

University  

Court Name: Jaipur-II

Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kala

Respondant Advocate Shubham

Case Number: 1406

|

Date of Filing: 27-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2016

Delhi

SERVE PRIYA PAUL V/S AMITY UNIVERSITY (UP)

University   Amity University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 07.09.16 Date of Decision: 14.09.16Appeal No. 460/11In the matter of: Amity University Uttar PradeshSector 125Gautam Budh NagarNOIDA ....Appellant VersusServe ...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 24-09-2016

Madhya Pradesh

LEEEDS METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY V/S GOURAV SAHAY

University  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 05-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2016

Delhi

RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LAW & ANR. V/S DEV RISHI

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate DEV RISHI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 560

|

Date of Filing: 24-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2016

NCDRC

UTI OF INDIA & ANR. V/S PUNJAB AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY LUDHIANA

University   Agriculture  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. GARG SHARMA & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. PARVEEN KUMAR MEHDIRATTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 51 OF 20051. PUNJAB AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY LUDHIANAThrough Its Comptroller, Ludhiana,Punjab. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UTI OF INDIA & ANR.Through Its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Having its Off...

Case Number: 51

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.