company-name-logo

University

Latest Judgments

Total 1728 Consumer Court Cases Against University.

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University Nagpur Through its Registrar V/S Gautam S/o Jethsurbhai Basiya

University  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate .

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. A/09/576(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/07/2009 in Case No. cc/08/170 of District Nagpur)1. Gautam S/o Jethsurbhai BasiyaR/o Untvad Dist- Amreli State of Gujrat 2. USHA D/O RAMANLAL O...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2017

Punjab

The Vice Chancellor Baba Farid University V/S Rashmi

University  

Court Name: Faridkot

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOTComplaint No. : 50Date of Institution: 17.02.2016Date of Decision : 07.02.2017Rashmi d/o Sh Sham Sunder C-85, New Cantt Road, Faridkot....ComplainantVersusThe Vice Chancellor, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Sadiq Road...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-02-2017

Gujarat

UNIVERSITY PETROLIAM V/S AKSHITASINH CHAUHAN

University  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate B.V.PANCHAL

Respondant Advocate V.M.PANCHOLI

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 06-02-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Lovely Professional University V/S Arif Iqbal Khan

University  

Court Name: Varanasi

Appelant Advocate C. Pal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 399

|

Date of Filing: 16-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 04-02-2017

NCDRC

NARRAVULA KOTESHWAR RAO V/S VENKATESHWARA UNIVERSITY

University  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. K. MARUTHI RAO & MS. K. RADHA

Respondant Advocate MR. PENUBAKU VENU

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2077 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 05/05/2016 in Appeal No. 1041/2016 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. VENKATESHWARA UNIVERSITYREPRESENTED BY THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS TIRUPATI,DISTRICT...

Case Number: 2077

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2017

Chandigarh

Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and technology, Village Makhnu Majra,P.O. Bhud Baddi District V/S Ajay Kumar

University  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.

Respondant Advocate Dharam PalAuthorised Representative

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 906 OF 2016Ajay Kumar and Anr. Vs Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and Tech. BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA, MEMBER HON’BLE MR. RA...

Case Number: 906

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2017

Madhya Pradesh

VIKRAM UNIVERSITY V/S MAMTA

University  

Court Name: Mandsaur

Appelant Advocate PANKAJ VED

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 87

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2017

Gujarat

RAY UNIVERSITY V/S POOJABEN GHADHVI

University  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate M.V.PATEL

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 05-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2017

Punjab

Ryat-Bahra University V/S Honey Wadhwa

University  

Court Name: Firozpur

Appelant Advocate Shalinder Bhalla

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 332

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-02-2017

Karnataka

Registrar Karnataka State Open University V/S P. Ganesh Bhat

University   Karnataka State Open University  

Court Name: Dakshina Kannada

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/269/20141. P. Ganesh BhatS/o. D.V. Bhat Aged about 32 years R/at Madavu House Madavu Post Puttur Tq D.K............Complainant(s)Versus1. Registrar Karnataka State Open UniversityManasagangotri Mysore 06............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE...

Case Number: 269

|

Date of Filing: 23-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 28-01-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against University in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against University ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against University under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.