Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUSHIL KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 149
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. CHAUDHARY LAW OFFICES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1727 OF 20161. SHALABH GUPTA & ANR.3103, MAPLEWOOD ROAD, AMES, IA 50014, U.S.A2. MRS. SWET SHAH3103, MAPLEWOOD ROAD, AMES, IA 50014, U.S.A...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LIMITED6, COMMUNITY ...
Case Number: 1727
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. GOSWAMI
Respondant Advocate M/S. AXON PARTNERS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1310 OF 20151. KRISHNA YADAVW/o. Late Dr. R.V.S. Yadav, R/o. C-8, Press Enclave, Saket, New Delhi - 110 017............Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH LIMITEDThrough Its Managing Director, Regd. Office : 6,...
Case Number: 1310
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SHWETA BAJAJ & MR. R.K. PANDEY
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 301 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/04/2014 in Complaint No. 56/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. M/S. UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.Through its Managing Director, Sales office at Grande pavillion Sec...
Case Number: 302
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.L. LAHOTY & MR. PABAN K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 431 OF 20171. ROMESH SAPRA & ANR.6, Jaipur Estate Nizamudin East New Delhi 1100132. Mrs. Manishi Sapra W/o Sh. Romesh Sapra 6, Jaipur Estate Nizamudin East New Delhi 110013...........Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 431
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. GOSWAMI
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI & M/S. AXON PARTNERS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1312 OF 20151. KAVITA FATEHPURIA & ANR.W/o. Sh. Manish K. Fatehpuria, R/o. 155, Arihant Nagar, 3rd Floor, Punjabi Bagh West,Delhi ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH LIMITEDThrough Its Managing Direc...
Case Number: 1312
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. BHATI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. R. K. PANDEY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 756 OF 20171. SHWETA GUPTA & ANR.W/o Rahul Agrawal, R/o 11/503, Shahjahannabad, CGHS, Sec 11, Plot No. 1, Dwarka New Delhi 2. Rahul Agrawal W/o N. K. Agrawal R/o 11/503, Shahjahannabad, CGHS, sec 11, Plot ...
Case Number: 756
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SHWETA BAJAJ & MR. R.K. PANDEY
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 301 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/04/2014 in Complaint No. 56/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. M/S. UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.Through its Managing Director, Sales office at Grande pavillion Sec...
Case Number: 301
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. GOSWAMI & M/S. ARS CHAUHAN & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI & M/S. AXON PARTNERS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1311 OF 20151. SANGITA SINGH & ANR.W/o. Sh. Jagbir Singh, R/o. Flat No. 303, Royal Retreat RR II, Charmwood Village Suraj Kund Road, Faridabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH LIMITEDThrough Its Ma...
Case Number: 1311
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anirudh Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 429
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.