Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Complaint Case No. 1007/2016In the matter of:Sh. Manoj S/o Dr. BrajeshR/o 613, Sector 29Noida 201301Ms. Aparna SinhaW/o Sh. ManojR/o 613, Sector 29Noida 201301 …….Complai...
Case Number: 1007
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parminder Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 738
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MAYANK JAIN, MR. MADHUR JAIN & MR. PARMATMA SINGH
Respondant Advocate M/S. BS LAW & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1984 OF 20171. MANISH KUMAR SOODS/o Mr. Devendra Mahindra, R/o H. No. 151, Uppkar Nagar, Ludhiana Punjab 141001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LTD.Through its Managing Director Regd. office ...
Case Number: 1984
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Prantick Ghosh
Respondant Advocate Mr. P. R. Bakshi
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Complaint Case No. CC/86/2016( Date of Filing : 29 Feb 2016 )1. Dr. Abhijit SenS/o, Dr. Sushil Chandra Sen, 128/1, Block - F, New Alipore, Kol - 700 053.2. Dr. Sushil Chandra SenS/o, ...
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.L. LAHOTY & MR. PABAN K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 432 OF 20171. SAURABH SRIVASTAVAC-482, Defence Colony, New Delhi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH HI-TECH DEVELOPERS LIMITEDP-7, Sector-18, NoidaU.P............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. ...
Case Number: 432
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate LALIT BAHL
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision:13.12.2018 Complaint Case No.1218/2016Shri Vikas Anand,S/o Shri S.P. Anand,B-1/65, Janakpuri,New Delhi -110058.Through SPAShri Ashish Anand.…. ComplainantVersu...
Case Number: 1218
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NIKHILESH R. & MR. SHIVRAM
Respondant Advocate M/S. BS LAW & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 571 OF 20171. RAJEEV RANJAN VEDERAH47, PASCHIM MARG, VASANT VIHAR.NEW DLEHI-110057...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LIMITED & 2 ORS.6, COMMUNITY CENTRE, SAKETNEW DLEHI-1100172. UNITECH LTD.UNI...
Case Number: 571
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate Jaisurya Jain
Respondant Advocate M/S. BS LAW & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1225 OF 20171. AMANDEEP SINGHS/o. Shri Paramjit Singh, R/o. 3223, Sector -28 D, Chandigarh ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH LIMITEDThrough Its Managing Director/Authorised Signatory, having its Co...
Case Number: 1225
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. PREMA PRIYADARSHINI & MR. ABHISHEK GUSAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. R.K. PANDEY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1307 OF 20171. SALEEM JAVED & ANR.S/o. Safdar Ali Khan, 610, Polo Town, Meydan,Dubai...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH HI-TECH DEVELOPERS LTD. & ANR.Through Its Directors, Real Estate Division (Mark...
Case Number: 1307
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No. 571 of 2017 Date of Institution 14.09.2017 Date of Decision 12.12.20181. Harpreet Singh son of late Sh. Balbir Singh, aged about 39 years2. Paramjeet Kaur wd/o late Sh. Balbir Singh Both r...
Case Number: 571
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.