Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AKHILESHWAR PANDEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4344 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 28/09/2010 in Appeal No. 186/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. PREET SINGHR/o. E-350, Greater Kailash-IINew Delhi - 110048Delhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 4344
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AKHILESHWAR PANDEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4345 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 28/09/2010 in Appeal No. 286/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. PREET SINGHR/o. E-350, Greater Kailash-IINew Delhi - 110048Delhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 4345
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIKAS GOYAL & KUMAR MUKESH
Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. PATTJOSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 122 OF 20091. RAKESH RASTOGI & ANR.S/o Sh. V.P. Rastogi, R/o R-2/65, Raj NagarGhaziabadU.P............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH HI-TECH DEVELOPERS LTD.Through its Chairman/Managing Director, Regd...
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Bibhas Bhuin. Mr. S. S. Mukherjee.
Respondant Advocate Mr. P. R. Bakshi.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGALBHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027CC NO. 50 Of 20101. Vineeta Agarwal.W/o Gopal Prasad Agarwal, BB-95, Salt Lake City, Kolkata - 700 064, P.S.- Bidhannagar (North)...........Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. INDIAN LAW PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 426 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 24/09/2010 in Complaint No. 208/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NEHA SINGHALD/O SH .ANIL KUMAR SINGHAL R/O :51,ASHOKA CRESENT ,GURGAON HARYANA ...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 426
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. INDIAN LAW PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 24/09/2010 in Complaint No. 176/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ABHISHEK SINGHALR/O:51, ASHOKA CRESENT ,GURGAON HARYANA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH ...
Case Number: 442
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH & MR. DEVESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 222 OF 20101. DEVESH WADHWAR/o. E-66, First Floor East of KailashNew Delhi-110065...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LTD.Through its Managing Director Mr. Sanjay Chandra Signature Towers-A South...
Case Number: 222
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH & MR. DEVESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 223 OF 20101. SANJAY KALRAS/o.Shri S.K. Kalra R/o.61, jasgriti Appartments Opp. Sainik Vihar Pitam PuraDelhi-34...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LTD.Through its Managing Director Mr. Saqnjay C...
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. SANTANAM
Respondant Advocate MS. SANJANA J. BALI (R-2)
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 199 OF 2009 1. SIDDHARTHA GUPTA & ANRS/o Mr. S.K. Gupta, R/o D-3-3538 Vasant KunjNew Delhi - 110 070 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH HI-TECH DEVELOPERS & ANRHaving its Registered Office at 6, Comm...
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH LUMB
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 146 OF 2008 1. DEEPAK BAHARI & ANRson of Late Shri S.K Bahri Resident of LGG -134, The Laburnun Sushaant Lok Phase -1Gurgaon-122002 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LTD.& ORS 6, Community Cent...
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2008
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2010
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.