Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/s MISHRA & ASSOCIATES,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 91 OF 20131. MR. SUMAN NANDI & 17 ORS.,S/o Mr. Susanta Nandi, R/o Jernbanevej, 11, S.T.T.V., Kalundborg,DENMARK 4400............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & ANR.,Through its Managing Director,...
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAMESH G. KAINTHOLA,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 90 OF 20131. Mrs. MANJU DEVI AGARWAL,W/o Shri Bajrang Lal Agarwal, R/o M-140, GF, Today Blossom-II,Sector-51,GURGAON............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & ANR.,Through its Managing Director,...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G.S.KALKURA
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/12/507(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/01/2012 in Case No. CC/10/333 of District None)1. UNITECH WIRELESS3RD FLOOR,,VANKARATH TOWERS,PALARIVATTOM,KOCHIERNAKULAMKERALA...........Appel...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K. DATTA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4272 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/05/2012 in Appeal No. 81/2012 & 2/2012 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. BRIJESH SINGHS/o Shri L.R Singh, R/o House no-2178, 2nd floor,Sector-44-CCHANDIGARH....
Case Number: 4272
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J. P. SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 138 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/01/2012 in Complaint No. 63/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PITTAR CHAND MITTALHouse No. 1276, Sector-10, PanchkulaHaryana...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHAY KUSHWAHA
Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. PATTAJOSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2013 IN CC/30/20091. RITU MAHAJAN UBEROY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. UNITECH LIMITED & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR....
Case Number: 148
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. YASHVIR SINGH & MR. RIPIN SOOD
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 659 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/09/2012 in Complaint No. 325/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SANJAY KUMAR SHARMAS/O. MR. R.R. SHARMA, R/O. A-267, DDA FLAT, UTTAM NAGAR,NEW DELHI-110059............
Case Number: 659
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 16 of 2013 1. Unitech Ltd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 01 Feb 2013 ORDER BEFORE THE DIS...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. RKG LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. S.G. SOLICITORS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 278-279 OF 2012 IN CC/214/20101. VINITA MAHADEW SINGH & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LTD. & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE, PR...
Case Number: 278
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRASHANTO CHANDRA SEN, Advocate
Respondant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 36 OF 20121. M/S. AANANDAM ESTATE PVT. LTD.4831/24, Prahlad Street Ansari Road,DaryaganjNew Delhi - 110 002...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH HI TECH DEVELOPERSRegd. Office, 6 Community Centre Saket...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.