Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL MUND & MR. S.K. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 672 OF 2013 IN FA/123/20121. M/S. UNITECH LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. BALVINDER SINGH GURAYA & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENTHON'B...
Case Number: 672
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. PRATIBHA SINHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 564 OF 2013 IN FA/617/20131. VISHAL ARYA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. UNITECH LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. VINEETA R...
Case Number: 564
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K. DATTA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 592 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 19/06/2013 in Complaint No. 2/2012 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. BRIJESH SINGHS/O. SHRI L.R. SINGH, R/O. HOUSE NO. 2178, 2ND FLOOR, SECTOR-44-C, CHANDIGARHPUNJAB ...
Case Number: 592
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J P Nagar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2013/1301. Vivek Prakash a BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. Smt Balkumari MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Op...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. PRATIBHA SINHA
Respondant Advocate MR. SUNIL GOEL & M/S AXON PARTNERS LLP
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 617 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 15/04/2013 in Complaint No. 322/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. VISHAL ARYAS/O. SHRI MADAN LAL ARYA R/O. APARTMENT NO. 304, BPTP FREEDOM PARK LIFE, SECTOR-57, GURGA...
Case Number: 617
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K. DATTA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3857 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/05/2012 in Appeal No. 3/2012&80/2012 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. RAHUL JOSHIS/o Shri J.C Joshi R/o House no-1051-B,Sector-16...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 3857
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SATISH AGGARWALA
Respondant Advocate M/S. SURI & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 240 OF 2013 IN CC/344/20121. SANJAY GOYAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. UNITECH LTD. & 3 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. DR. S.M...
Case Number: 240
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SATISH AGGARWALA
Respondant Advocate M/S. SURI & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 344 OF 20121. SANJAY GOYALS/o. Shri. S.P. Goyal, R/o. 104-A, Hamilton Court, DLF, Phase-IV,Gurgaon - 122 002...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH LTD. & 3 ORS.Registered office at: 6, Community Cewntre...
Case Number: 344
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 154 OF 20131. Mr. RAJINDER RAI,S-53, Panchsheel Park,NEW DELHI - 110017............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD.,UGCC Pavillion, Sector 96, Express Way, (Near Amity Management School),NOIDA - 201...
Case Number: 154
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SATISH AGGARWALA
Respondant Advocate M/S. SURI & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 218 OF 2013 IN CC/344/20121. SANJAY GOYAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. UNITECH LTD. & 3 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. DR. B.C...
Case Number: 218
|
Date of Filing: 20-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.