Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J. P. SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 374 OF 2013 IN FA/138/20121. PITTAR CHAND MITTAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LIMITED REAL ESTATE DIVISION & 3 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, ...
Case Number: 374
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Falguni Bandopadhyay.
Respondant Advocate Mr. P.R. Bakshi
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087CC NO. 83 Of 20111. Sri Suresh Kumar Kanodia.S/o Sri Radheshyam Kanodia, 1, R.N. Mukherjee Road, 4th Floor, Room no.5&6, Kolkata-1, Residence -BC-34, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-64, P.S. ...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANTOSH K. SETHI,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 351 OF 20131. M/s MAYANK PODDAR HUF,Through its Karta, SHri Mayank Poddar, Park Centre, 9th Floor, 24, Park Street,KOLKATA - 700016............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LTD. & 2 ORS.,Regd. Office:...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. CHANDRA SHEKHER YADAV, Advocate
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 241 OF 2011 WITH IA/532/20131. ANJANA ARORA & ANR.W/o. Mr. Ashish Kumar Kulshreshtha, R/o. P-402, Purva Fountain Square, Marathahalli,Banagalore - 5600372. Mr. Ashish Kumar KulshreshthaS/o. Sh. Harish Cha...
Case Number: 241
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. CHANDRA SHEKHER YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 273 OF 2011 WITH IA/531/20131. HITENDRA MAHAJAN & ANR.S/o. Sh. Y.P. Mahajan. R/o. 2/119, Sunder Vihar, Outer Ring RoadNew Delhi - 110 087.2. Mrs. Abha GuptaW/o. Sh. Hitendra MahajanR/o. 2/119, Sunder Viha...
Case Number: 273
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Case Number: 524
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sartaj S. Narula Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/121/20131. Mrs. Manveen GhaiChd. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERAs per office report no stay order or any other order has been received from the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redress...
Case Number: 121
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/32/30131. Mrs. Manveen GhaiChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Unitech Ltd. Registered office, 6, Community Centre, Saket New Delhi-110017 thrugh its Managing Directors Ajay Chandra and Sanjay Chandra Local Office: SCO No. 189-190-191,Level-1, Sector-...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL MUND & MR. S.K. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate MR.SATINDER S GULATI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 670 OF 2013 IN FA/121/20121. M/S. UNITECH LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. JIWANDEEP SINGH GHAI & ANR............Respondent(s) MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 671 OF 2013 IN FA/122/20121. M...
Case Number: 670
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL MUND & MR. S.K. DUBEY
Respondant Advocate MR.SATINDER S GULATI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 670 OF 2013 IN FA/121/20121. M/S. UNITECH LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. JIWANDEEP SINGH GHAI & ANR............Respondent(s) MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 671 OF 2013 IN FA/122/20121. M...
Case Number: 671
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.