Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rupinder Singh Jhand
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:128 of 2016Date of Institution:04.04.2016Date of Decision:02.06.2016Surinder Kaur wife of Sh.Jatinder Singh, resident of 4644 Parma In Frisco, TX, 75034, USA, at present resident of Jatinder Poultry F...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.K.GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No. 115 of 2015 Date of Institution 10.07.2015 Date of Decision 01.06.20161. Dhiraj Gupta son of Sh. B.K. Gupta.2. Punita Gupta wife of Dhiraj Gupta, resident of 260, Block-K, Spangle Condoes...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ANURADHA GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 119 of 2016 Date of the Institution: 10.05.2016 Date of Decision:- 31.05.2016Prerna Goyal d/o Som Dutt Goyal w/o Sh. Pankaj Gupta r/o 1959, Silver Bell Road, Apartment No.312, City Eagen, State MN,...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.S.Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDEEP DEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 507 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 26/02/2016 in Complaint No. 266/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NEERU AHUJA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LIMITED...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: ...
Case Number: 507
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Puneet Sharma Adv. & Ravi Kumar Bhatti Adv., Himanshu Chhabra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:305/2016Date of Institution:05.05.2016Date of Decision:26.05.2016Subhash Chander s/o Sh.Panchhi Ram r/o H.No.59, Sector-8A, Chandigarh ... Complainant.VersusCEO/Director, Unitech Ltd., 6, Community...
Case Number: 305
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-06-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SARAD SINGHANIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 173 OF 20161. GAURAV PARASRAMPURIA & ANR.10B2,, PEAK TOWER, HILAND PARK, 1925, CHAKGARIA,KOLKATA-700094...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BENGAL UNITECH UNIVERSAL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ANR.22, CAMAC ST...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. PREMA PRIYADARSHINI
Respondant Advocate M/S AXON PARTNERS LLP
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 327 OF 20151. POONAM RANIW/o. Shri Abhishek Singh, S/o. Shri R.N. Singh, Both Resident of K-210, Kangra Niketan, Vikaspuri, New Delhi - 110 018............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LIMITEDThrough...
Case Number: 327
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 513 OF 20141. LT. COL. AJAY SINGH & ANR.A-301, New Greenwood CGHS Ltd. Plot No. 6, Sector - 52,GURGAON - 122003............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LIMITED & ANR.6, Community Centre Saket, NEW DE...
Case Number: 513
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. SURUCHI KAUSHIK,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 135 OF 20141. Shri VINEET JAIN & ANR.,Flat No. 204, Tower 7, Uniworld Garden, Sector-47, Sohna Road,GURGAON............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s UNITECH LIMITED & ANR.,Through its Managing Director, Signa...
Case Number: 135
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.