Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM II AGRACOLLECTORATE CAMPUS AGRAComplaint Case No. CC288/2013-I1. SHIV SHANKAR MUDGALHNO 68 PUSHPANJALI VATIKA SIKANDRA AGRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BRANCH MANAGER M/S UNITECH WIRELESS PRIVATE LTD SHOP NO 5 6 7 8 BLOCK NO 41 SANJ...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants on account of some technical defects, wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file a-fresh one after impleading Alice Developers, as one of the parties. To the prayer made, no objection has been raised by Counsel...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant on account of some technical defects, wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file a-fresh one after impleading Alice Developers, as one of the parties. To the prayer made, no objection has been raised by Cou...
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vishal Goel
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Nirmal Singh Jagdeva, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H.Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:32 of 2016Date of Institution:28.01.2016Date of Decision:19.07.2016Gulshan Kumar Chhabra S/o Sh. Radhe Shyam Chhabra, resident of H.No. 287, Sector 21-C, Behind Malhotra Clinic, Aery Mill Road, Mandi ...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Kumar Bamal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:161 of 2016Date of Institution:25.04.2016Date of Decision:19.07.2016Shri Amandeep Singh Kanwar aged 43 years, son of Shri Jagdev Singh Kanwar.Simmerpreet Randhawa aged 43 years, wife of Shri Amandeep ...
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. I.S. BHATIA & MR. VINEET BALI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 739 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 05/08/2015 in Complaint No. 173/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. NAVEDITTA DHAWANW/O. SH. SANJEEV DHAWAN, PRESENTLY R/O. HOUSE NO. 188, NEW JAWAHAR NAGAR, COOL ROAD...
Case Number: 739
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Inderjit Kaushal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file a-fresh one after impleading Alice Developers, as one of the parties. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that the ...
Case Number: 141
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Inderjit Kaushal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file a-fresh one after impleading Alice Developers, as one of the parties. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that the ...
Case Number: 142
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JPS Sidhu
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 154
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.