Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manu Loona
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Khunger, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:202 of 2016Date of Institution:11.05.2016Date of Decision:02.08.2016Dr.Neeraj Singla son of Sh.Kewal Ram Singla.Mrs.Monika Bansal wife of Dr.Neeraj Singla.Complainants Nos.1 and 2 both are residents o...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sunil K Sahore, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:259 of 2016Date of Institution:09.06.2016Date of Decision:02.08.2016Jatinder Mumick wife of AIR Cmde S.S. Mumick (Retd.)AIR Cmde Surjit Singh Mumick (Retd.) son of Sh.Dayal Singh MumickBoth residents ...
Case Number: 259
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHASHANK SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1121 OF 20161. DR. SUDHIR KALHAN & 5 ORS.2C/25,NEW ROHTAK ROADDELHI - 1100052. Dr. Benu Kalhan 2C/25, New Rohtak Road,Delhi 1100053. Monica Bhatia D6/6124, Vasant KunjDelhi 4. Sanjeev Bhatia D6/6124, Vasan...
Case Number: 1121
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. N.S. Jagdeva, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:177 of 2016Date of Institution:03.05.2016Date of Decision:01.08.2016Sanjeev Dhir son of Krishan Gopal aged 48 years, resident of House No.52, Sector 20-D, Subhash Nagar, Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fat...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Vertika H. Singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/245/20161. Krishan Lal SainiChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Unitech LimitedChandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA PANDEY M...
Case Number: 245
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. MAHAJAN & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S AXON PARTNERS LLP
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 512 OF 20151. SUNDEEP MADANRamesh Chander R/o. E-102, Sujjan Vihar, Sector - 43,Gurgaon Haryana - 122 002............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LTD.Through Its Managing Director and Director, R/o....
Case Number: 512
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. HARISH UPPAL & MR. T. PRASAD
Respondant Advocate M/S. AXON PARTNERS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 709 OF 20151. ANKUR GOEL204, Block 5, The Palms, South City-1, Gurgaon - 122 001............Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH RELIABLE PROJECTS PVT. LTD.6, Community Centre, Saket, New Delhi - 110 017...........
Case Number: 709
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. HARISH UPPAL & MR. T. PRASAD
Respondant Advocate M/S. AXON PARTNERS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 720 OF 20151. MUNISH AGGARWAL & ANR.C-140, Madhuban Enclave, New Delhi - 110 092............Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH RELIABLE PROJECTS PVT. LTD.Registered Office: 6, Community Centre, Saket,New Delhi...
Case Number: 720
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:227 of 2016Date of Institution:23.05.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Vishal Bhardwaj son of Kewal Krishan Bhardwaj, R/o 8/802, NRI Complex, Seawaoods Estate, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, PIN 400706.&helli...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.