Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Katyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rajinder Kumar Dogra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:338 of 2016Date of Institution:06.07.2016Date of Decision:20.10.2016Dr.Paramvir Singh son of Mohinder Singh, resident of House No.1931, Phase-10, Sector 64, Mohali.Dr.Jaspreet Kaur wife of Dr.Paramvir...
Case Number: 432
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ruhani Chadha, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:338 of 2016Date of Institution:06.07.2016Date of Decision:20.10.2016Dr.Paramvir Singh son of Mohinder Singh, resident of House No.1931, Phase-10, Sector 64, Mohali.Dr.Jaspreet Kaur wife of Dr.Paramvir...
Case Number: 467
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Directions issued by Delhi High Court in Para 10 of the order dated 02.09.2016 passed in Company Application (Main) No.88 of 2016, read thus:-“10. In response to the aforesaid application, the respondent company initially filed its short preliminary submissions vide affidav...
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Case Number: 382
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHALABH GUPTA & MR. JATIN DHAWAN
Respondant Advocate AXON Partners LLP
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 222 OF 20141. PRADEEP CHOWDHRY & ANR.R/o. 97, Mount Kailash, East of Kailash,New Delhi - 652. Ms. Madhu ChowdhryR/o. 97, Mount Kailash, East Of Kailash, New Delhi -65...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITE...
Case Number: 222
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, looking into directions issued by Delhi High Court in Company Application (Main) No.88 of 2016 on 02.09.2016, Counsel for the Decree Holder/complainant, wishes to withdraw this Execution Application, with liberty to file a-fresh one, as and when final...
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Vaibhav Narang, Adv.
At the time of arguments, taking note of directions issued by Delhi High Court in Company Application (Main) No.88 of 2016 on 02.09.2016 and also on account of directions issued by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi ordering the Judgment De...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Vaibhav Narang, Adv.
At the time of arguments, taking note of directions issued by Delhi High Court in Company Application (Main) No.88 of 2016 on 02.09.2016 and also on account of directions issued by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi ordering the Judgment De...
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Vaibhav Narang , Adv.
At the time of arguments, taking note of directions issued by Delhi High Court in Company Application (Main) No.88 of 2016 on 02.09.2016 and also on account of directions issued by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi ordering the Judgment ...
Case Number: 73
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vishal Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rahul Bhargava, Adv.
At the time of arguments, taking note of directions issued by Delhi High Court in Company Application (Main) No.88 of 2016 on 02.09.2016 and also on account of directions issued by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi ordering the Judgment De...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.