Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision: 19.12.2016Complaint Case No. 176/2009In the matter of:Mr. Abishek singhalS/o Mr. Anil Kumar SinghalR/o 51, Ashoka Crescent DLF CityPhase-I, Gurgaon-122002 ............
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 13-01-2017
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/16/10701. Neha Pradhan#5th,Kamala Niva,20th Cross,5th Main ,N.S.Palya,BTM2nd Stage 560076BengaluruKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Unitech LtdBranch...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Case Number: 281
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2016
Court Name: Cooch Behar
Appelant Advocate Mr. Ranadhir Das,
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumB. S. Road, Cooch BeharPh. No.230696, 222023Complaint Case No. CC/68/20161. Mrs. Arati Das,W/o. Ranadhir Das, Tribrita Sarani Bye Lane, B.C. Road, Cooch Behar-736101............Complainant(s)Versus1. Mr. Ramesh Chandra, (President of Unit...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-11-2016
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate compl.in person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Consumer Complaint No. 600 of 17.08.2016Date of Decision : 23.11.2016Sardara Singh Chana I.F.S.(Retd.), 58-I, Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana-141001.….. Complainant Versus1.Unitech Limited, 6, Community Centre, (regd.Office) Sak...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate A.S. Barnala
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 226 OF 2016Sandeep Walia and anr. Vs Unitech Limited and anr. BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.M.S.Saini, Counsel for Complainants....
Case Number: 226
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 22.11.16Date of Decision: 02.12.16Complaint No. 563/14In the matter of:Shri Vikas KaushalS/o Late Shri S.K.KaushalResident of House No. 987Sector 22B, GurgaonHa...
Case Number: 563
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate R.K.Dogra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:562 of 2016Date of Institution:09.09.2016Date of Decision:21.11.2016Anuj Ohri son of Late Sh.Vinod Kumar Ohri, resident of House no.1470/A, Sector 61, Chandigarh.…… ComplainantV e r s u ...
Case Number: 479
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rupinder Singh Jhand Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rajinder Kumar Dogra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:562 of 2016Date of Institution:09.09.2016Date of Decision:21.11.2016Anuj Ohri son of Late Sh.Vinod Kumar Ohri, resident of House no.1470/A, Sector 61, Chandigarh.…… ComplainantV e r s u ...
Case Number: 562
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Goel Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rajinder Kumar Dogra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:562 of 2016Date of Institution:09.09.2016Date of Decision:21.11.2016Anuj Ohri son of Late Sh.Vinod Kumar Ohri, resident of House no.1470/A, Sector 61, Chandigarh.…… ComplainantV e r s u ...
Case Number: 564
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.