Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhivadya Sood Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Vertika singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:623 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:25.01.2017Kiran Arora widow of Shri Rajesh Arora.Renu Aora wife of Shri Dinesh Gupta.Both are residents of P.C.M.S.D. College for Women, Nehru...
Case Number: 810
|
Date of Filing: 15-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Adv. Mahesh I. Dhatrak
...
Case Number: 130
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sunil Toni, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. On submitting one photocop...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MADHUR PRABHAT
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments:23.01.17 Date of Decision:27.01.17Complaint No. 1570/2016In the matter of:1. Harsh Bhargava S/o Ramesh Chand Bhargava R/o Plot No. 553, Scheme No. 2 Near Water Work...
Case Number: 1570
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SATINDER S. GULATI
Respondant Advocate MR. SUNIL MUND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4022 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/07/2012 in Appeal No. 120/2012 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUSHPINDER SINGHThrough his General Power Of Attorney,Janinder Jain, S/o Sh.Om Prakash Jain,...
Case Number: 4022
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1224 OF 20151. RITA SRIVASTAVAR/o. 1137 Paloma Avenue Unit-I, BurlingameCalifornia...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LIMITED & ANR.Through Its Managing Director, Signature Towers, Ground Floor,...
Case Number: 1224
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2017
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manish Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. On submitting one pho...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.