Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. VIVEK CHIB & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. BABANJEET SINGH MEW
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1167 OF 20161. M/S. SN MOHANTYWEIGH-BRIDGE RAOD, POST BOX- 21, DISTRICT- KEONJHAR, P.O. BARBIL - 758035, ORISSA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH HI-TECH DEVELOPERS LTD.BASEMENT 6, COMMUNITY CENTRE ...
Case Number: 1167
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gurpreet Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Vertika singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:762 of 2016Date of Institution:03.11.2016Date of Decision:06.02.2017Amrik Singh son of Late Shri Rattan Lal, resident of #992, B-1m Ratpur Colony, Pinjore, Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula 134102 (Har...
Case Number: 762
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy of paper-b...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Raja Bahadur Singh Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :03/02/2017ORDER Sh. Raja Bahadur Singh Jain, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that in view of the judgment Ambrish Kumar Shukla (NC), he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this compla...
Case Number: 399
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SURESH
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 30.01.17 Date of Decision: 02.02.17Complaint No. 659/2014In the matter of:1. Shri Arvind Agrawal s/O Shri G.P.Agrawal C/o M/s G.P. Agrawal & Associates 7-A, Ki...
Case Number: 659
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANAT KUMAR & MR. SUNIL KUMAR JHA
Respondant Advocate M/S. AXON PARTNERS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1272 OF 20151. BELU SYALD-1/2, VASANT VIHAR,NEW DELHI-110057...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNITECH HI-TECH DEVELOPERS LTD. & ANR. GRANDE PAVILLION SECTOR-96, ESPRESS WAY (NEAR AMITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL)NO...
Case Number: 1272
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2017
Court Name: Cooch Behar
Appelant Advocate Mr. Mokabber Ali, In person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumB. S. Road, Cooch BeharPh. No.230696, 222023Complaint Case No. CC/92/20161. Mr. Mokabber Ali,C/o. Asoke Ganguly, Akankha Apartment, R.R.N. Road Bye Lane, West of Narasingha Dighi, Cooch Behar-736101............Complainant(s)Versus1. Mr. R...
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
Respondant Advocate M/S. AXON PARTNERS LLP
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 799 OF 20161. LUV BHASINU28 1/1, DLF TOWN PHASE III, GRUGAON, HARYANA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. UNITECH LIMITED(THROUGH ITS MD) 6, COMMUNITY CENTRE, SAKET, NEW DELHI-110017............Opp.Party...
Case Number: 799
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Vertika singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:623 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:25.01.2017Kiran Arora widow of Shri Rajesh Arora.Renu Aora wife of Shri Dinesh Gupta.Both are residents of P.C.M.S.D. College for Women, Nehru...
Case Number: 623
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms.Vertika singh, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:624 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:25.01.2017Ashok Goyal son of Sh.Hem Raj Goyal, resident of #2342, Astha Apartment, Sector 48-C, Chandigarh.…… ComplainantV e r s...
Case Number: 624
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unitech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unitech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unitech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.