Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ajit Singh, Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.B.J.Singh, Adv. for the respondent
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 254 of 2011 1. Vardan Singh RanaSon of Sh. Ram Murti Singh Rana, age 19 years R/o H.No. 2160/3, Sector 45-C, Chandigarh ............
Case Number: 254
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/754(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/03/2004 in Case No. C/02/6 of District Satara)1. SMT. PRABHUNE S. SHAMRAO28, YADOGOPAL PETH, SATARA............Appellant(s)Versus1. UNIT TRUS...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2073 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 04/01/2010 in Appeal No. 468/1997 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. ZINAT FATIMA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. UNIT TRUST OF INDIA...........Respondent(s) ...
Case Number: 2073
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DHARAM DEV
Respondant Advocate MR. D. BHARAT KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1961 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 02/06/2007 in Appeal No. 1002/2005 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. UNIT TRUST OF INDIA AND ANR.UTI INVESTORS SERVICES LIMITED CPC PLOT NO. 3. SECTOR, 11 CBD BE...
Case Number: 1961
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2011
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/09/7121. Ms. Aparajita Mukul Ranjan108, Nugget, Opp Samna Press, New Prabhadevi Road,Mumbai-25............Complainant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Naginder Singh Vashist & Harit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 146 of 2011 1. Nitiak SharmaD/o Sh. Satish Kumar Sharma, Flat No. 231, Ground Floor, United Co-operative House Building Society (...
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate MATHEW SKARIA,
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1641. JOICY JOY@ P.J.JOYCYD/O JOY, AGED 22 YEARS, PULICKAL HOUSE, KANNAMALI, KOCHI-8, NOW RESIDING AT KONNULLY HOUSE, PALARIVATTOM P.O., SOUTH JANATHA, KOCHI-682 025 Kerala2. P.A.JOHNSON, S/O ANTONY,PULICKAL HOUSE, KANNAMALI P.O.ErnakulamKerala..............
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SATISH PACHORI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 843 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 08/12/2009 in Appeal No. 319/2008 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. MEHTA KOKILABEN MADHUKANTBHAIA-13, Third Floor, Shyam Vihar Apartment, Jagdish Bunglow Road, Vas...
Case Number: 843
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2011
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 680 of 2010 1. Nitika SharmaD/o Sh. Satish Kumar Sharma Flat No. 231 Ground Floor United Co-Operative House Bldg. Society(Opp. Army Institute of Law...
Case Number: 680
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Vijay B. Chavan
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. 268/20091. Kapurchand H. Malesha703 himachal juhu road,Andheri(W) mumbaiMumbai-58Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Unit Trust of India Techniligyplot no. 3,sector 11,CBD belapur,navi mumbaiMumbai-614Maharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: SHRI.S....
Case Number: 268
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Unit Trust Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Unit Trust Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Unit Trust Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.