Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv.V.F.Jose
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/08/2151. Union Of India Rep by Sr.Superintendent,Postal DepartmentPostal Department,Thrissur Division,Thrissur Head Post Office,ThrissurThrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Asst.EngineerElectric Section,KSEB,KoorkkencheryThrissurKerala2. Asst.Exec...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. REKHA AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4002 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 29/06/2010 in Appeal No. 316/2007 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. UNION OF INDIATthrough-General Manager, Western Railway, ChurchgateMumbaiMaharashtra2. DIVISION...
Case Number: 4002
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT JAIN
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2940 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 14/05/2007 in Appeal No. 1552/2006 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.THROUGH ITS SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY AMBALA CANT...
Case Number: 2940
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2007
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA
Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT SWAROOP SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3524 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/07/2011 in Appeal No. 72/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.General Manager, Eastern Central RailwayPatnaBihar2. Station Manager...
Case Number: 3524
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VINOD JOSHI
Respondant Advocate SH. U.B. WAVIKAR
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/206(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/09/2009 in Case No. 197/2008 of District Nashik)1. UNION OF INDIA & ORSPOST GENERAL MASTER AURANGABAD AURANGABADMaharastra...........Appellan...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MUKESH YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3492 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 31/05/2011 in Appeal No. 2673/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SATISH CHANDER GROVERS/o Sant lal Grover, R/o H.No-4837, MOhalla Muftiwara Subhash Nagar,. Teh...
Case Number: 3492
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. REKHA AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3290 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/04/2011 in Appeal No. 37/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.Madhya Central Railway, BhussawalMaharastra2. Divsional Railway Manager,Divi...
Case Number: 3290
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 247 OF 20111. KIMTI LAL SHARMA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNION OF INDIA & ANR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S. K. NAIK, MEMBER For ...
Case Number: 247
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A N SAMANT
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/11/103(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/07/2011 in Case No. 134/2011 of District DCF, South Mumbai)1. UNION OF INDIAREPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY CHIEF COMMER...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Union Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Union Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Union Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.