Union Of India
Latest Judgments
Total 1663 Consumer Court Cases Against Union Of India.
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
tHE UNION OF INDIA V/S SHIR. ARVIND TUKARAM RAUT.
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. D. S. PHOGAT
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 93 Of 20121. SHIR. ARVIND TUKARAM RAUT.ROOM NO 58/01 NA VAL CIVILIAN COLONY, KANJURMARG (W) ,MUMABI-7MUMABIMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. tHE UNION OF INDIA SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEGENCE, SOUTY BLOCK, NEW DELHI.NEW DELHI2. THE CHIEF OF NAVAL STAFFNAVAL HEAD Q...
Case Number: 93
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
UNION OF INDIA V/S PRAVINBHAI M SURELIYA,
Court Name: Ahmedabad City
Appelant Advocate DINESH PANCHAL
Respondant Advocate KETAN DAVE
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2019
Case Number: 258
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2016
Union of India V/S Naresh Kumar
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Rajan singla
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/241. Naresh Kumarson of Kaur chand r/o 138-b,st.No.7B,Harpal Nagar,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Union of IndiaMinistry of Rai...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Union of India V/S Ruhee Sahni
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 340 of 2011 1. Ruhee SahniR/o # 654, Sector 8, Panchkula. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Union of Indiathrough General Manager, Northern Railway, New Delhi.2. T.T. Train Superintendent FRP,Agra.3. Station Master,Railway S...
Case Number: 340
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PRAVINBHAI M. SURAIYA V/S UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANUJ AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. PRANK ADYARYU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1979 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/11/2010 in Appeal No. 981/2008 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.THROUGH SUPRINTENDENT OF POST, NAVRANGPURA POST OFFICE AHEMDABADGUJRAT.......
Case Number: 1979
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2012
SHRI. S.K.MALHOTRA V/S UNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. MR. A.N. SAMANT
Respondant Advocate MR. J.M. BAPHANA
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/05/502(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. First Appeal No. of District Thane)1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGERCENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI CST, MUMBAI............Appe...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Union of India C/o. Div. Manager, Central Railway V/S Sau. Meena Vinod Moon
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sandip V. Dangore
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/11/4561. Sau. Meena Vinod MoonPlot No. 28, Swaraj Nagar, Near Reliance Fresh, Manewada Road,NagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
N. NETHRAVATHI V/S UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.N. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3749 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 16/08/2007 in Appeal No. 2443/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Through Post master General In Karnataka, Police Thimmaiah CircleBangal...
Case Number: 3749
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Union Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Union Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Union Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.