company-name-logo

Union Of India

Latest Judgments

Total 1663 Consumer Court Cases Against Union Of India.

NCDRC

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V/S DR. R.P. MANGAL

Union Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. TEMPLE LAW FIRM

Respondant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 533 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 24/11/2006 in Appeal No. 2964/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. R.P. MANGALS/O. OF LATE , SHRI SITA RM MANGAL RESIDENT OF 37 /372 DAYAL BAGH RAOD PS...

Case Number: 533

|

Date of Filing: 19-02-2007

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2012

NCDRC

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V/S SMT. MANORAMA MANGAL

Union Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. TEMPLE LAW FIRM

Respondant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 533 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 24/11/2006 in Appeal No. 2964/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. R.P. MANGALS/O. OF LATE , SHRI SITA RM MANGAL RESIDENT OF 37 /372 DAYAL BAGH RAOD PS...

Case Number: 534

|

Date of Filing: 19-02-2007

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2012

NCDRC

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS V/S DR. RAJEEV MANGAL

Union Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. TEMPLE LAW FIRM

Respondant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 533 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 24/11/2006 in Appeal No. 2964/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. R.P. MANGALS/O. OF LATE , SHRI SITA RM MANGAL RESIDENT OF 37 /372 DAYAL BAGH RAOD PS...

Case Number: 535

|

Date of Filing: 19-02-2007

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2012

Madhya Pradesh

UNION OF INDIA - EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY. V/S SMT.KAVITA MADAN

Union Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 28-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

SMT.KAVITA MADAAN V/S UNION OF INDIA

Union Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 19-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Union of India V/S Subodh Chandra Mathur

Union Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2016

NCDRC

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. V/S SHANTI KUMAR JAIN

Union Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MUNEEB EFFENDI

Respondant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3792 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 10/08/2007 in Appeal No. 1697/2005-1741/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SHANTI KUMAR JAINS/O SRI VIJAY KUMAR JAIN R/O 372/1, SAMRAHI RAOD, SAHADATGANJ...

Case Number: 3792

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2012

Madhya Pradesh

Asif, Bhopal V/S Union Of India

Union Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 01-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 02-02-2016

NCDRC

UNION OF INDIA V/S S.C. MARIAPPAN

Union Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MULLAPUDI RAMBABU

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 315 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 28/06/2011 in Complaint No. 165/2001 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. S.C. MARIAPPANS/o. Chellam, no. 7/1, Thatchi Arunachalam, Street, Mylapore, Chennai-600004Tamil...

Case Number: 315

|

Date of Filing: 17-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2012

NCDRC

NARESH AHLAWAT & ANR. V/S UNION OF INDIA

Union Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. SAROJ BIDAWAT BANSAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 562 OF 2012 IN RP/1916/20121. UNION OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. NARESH AHLAWAT & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'B...

Case Number: 562

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Union Of India in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Union Of India ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Union Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.