Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3308 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/07/2011 in Appeal No. 267/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH MA/740/2012,IA/5766/20131. K. N. PAREEK S/o Late Shri N Pareeek, R/o 299 Khuteton La Rast...
Case Number: 3308
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dr. Uday Veer Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1998/3004( Date of Filing : 10 Dec 1998 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union of IndiaNew Delhi..............
Case Number: 1998
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-1998
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.L. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. ARUN KUMAR SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 72 OF 20011. NIRMAL DEVI CHOPRAW/O LATE SH. R.C. CHOPRAB - 28 LAJPAT NAGAR - IIINEW DELHI ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UNION OF INDIATHROUGH SECRETARYRAILWAY BOARD RAIL MANTRALYA RAISINA ROAD NEW DELH...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2001
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAILESH PRAKASH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 524 OF 2013 IN RP/1874/20121. UNION OF INDIA & 5 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. YASH INDUSTRIES & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBE...
Case Number: 524
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BALDEV MALIK & MR. ARJUN MALIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3832 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 04/06/2012 in Appeal No. 308/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.Department Of Post Rep By its Director General New Delhi - 1100012. Supe...
Case Number: 3832
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. REKHA AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 23/11/2012 in Appeal No. 2825/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. UNION OF INDIA & 3 ORS.THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHER RAILWAY, BARODA HOUSENEW DEL...
Case Number: 1115
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BALDEV MALIK
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3079 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/03/2012 in Appeal No. 736/2011 of the State Commission Orissa)1. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Department of Posts Rep By its Director GeneralNew Delhi - 110 001Delhi2. T...
Case Number: 3079
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. NILOFAR QURESHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4344 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/08/2012 in Appeal No. 113/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. UNION OF INDIAThrough Regional Passport Officer, J-14, Jhalana Industrial Area, Jhalana, Dhoo...
Case Number: 4344
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. NILOFAR QURESHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4344 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/08/2012 in Appeal No. 113/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. UNION OF INDIAThrough Regional Passport Officer, J-14, Jhalana Industrial Area, Jhalana, Dhoo...
Case Number: 4345
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.V. BALAKRISHNAN
Respondant Advocate MR. NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 139 OF 19991. DINESH CHANDMs. Pallavi Agarwal, C-628, New Fiends Colony, (Second Floor)New Delhi - 110 065.2. Ms. Prachi AgarwalDaughter of (late) Shri Dinesh Chand, C-628, New Fiends Colony, (Second Floor...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-1999
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Union Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Union Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Union Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.