Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. PREM LATA NIGAM
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3069 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/01/2013 in Appeal No. 220/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/5332/2013,IA/5333/2013,IA/6525/2013,IA/6526/20131. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.THROUGH SE...
Case Number: 3069
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NITIN N. LONKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2397 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/02/2012 in Appeal No. 206/2010 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/3987/2013,IA/3988/20131. ANIL AJIT MEHTA & 2 ORS.THROUGH POST MASTER GENERAL, AURANGA...
Case Number: 2397
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1893 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 31/10/2012 in Appeal No. 138/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGIS/O SRI BABU RAM RASTOGI, 3393 MAHRAJNAGAR, LAKHIMPUR KHERI - 262701U...
Case Number: 1893
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RUCHIR MISHRA & MUKESH KUMAR TIWARI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 602 OF 2012 IN RP/3947/20111. UNION OF INDIA & ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. ANJANI KUMAR AGARWAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON...
Case Number: 602
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.A. SATTAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3171 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/05/2013 in Appeal No. 655/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan) WITH IA/5574/20131. UNION OF INDIADIVISIONAL RAILWAY ,JAIPURRAJASTHAN...........Petitioner(s)V...
Case Number: 3171
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.A. SATTAR
Respondant Advocate MR. R.C. GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2839 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/04/2012 in Appeal No. 2308/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/4886/20131. UNION OF INDIA & 6 ORS.THROUGH CHAIRMAN RAILWAY,NEW DELHI2. THE G.M.,NOR. R...
Case Number: 2839
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.N. SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. B. MAHAPATRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 457 OF 2013 IN FA/408/20071. UNION OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. Smt .K. Saraswati ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. VINEETA ...
Case Number: 457
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. A. S. Rao/C. V. Lad
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/98/1863(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. 208/95 of District Thane)1. Union Of IndiaThrough General Manager, Kalyan Telecom District, Kalyan, Dist. ThaneThaneMaharashtr...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-1998
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAILESH PRAKASH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1874 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/02/2012 in Appeal No. 1778/2005 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. UNION OF INDIA & 5 ORS.Through General Manager, West,Central RailwayJabalpurM.P2. The Divisi...
Case Number: 1874
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2013
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/11/301. Premaja K8A Maple Heights, PattomTVMKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Secretary, Union of India and 4 othersNew Delhi2. The General manager, Southern RailwayChen...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Union Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Union Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Union Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.