Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
Respondant Advocate MR. S.R. BANSAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3787 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/06/2011 in Appeal No. 2352/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UHBVNLUHBVNL, Model TOwn,AmbalaHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ARUN AGGARWALS/o. Sh Jy...
Case Number: 3787
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4542 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/05/2012 in Appeal No. 1663/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SDO UHBVNLSub Division ChhachrauliYAMUNA NAGARHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. GURMEJ S...
Case Number: 4542
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. CHANHAN & MR. AKASH GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 827 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/11/2012 in Appeal No. 1150/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1492/20131. UHBVNLTHROUGH ITS ARR(OP) SUB DIVISION) ASSANDHKARNALHARYANA...........Petit...
Case Number: 827
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUKHDA PRITAM
Respondant Advocate MR. DEV RAJ CHHABRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 780 OF 2013 IN RP/939/20081. S.D.O. OP. SUB DIVISION NO. 1 UHBVNL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. JAI PRAKASH ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEM...
Case Number: 780
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURISPERITUS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4857 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 31/05/2012 in Appeal No. 653/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER(OP) UHBVNLCity Sub Division, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd, Bahad...
Case Number: 4857
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADEEP DAHIYA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1760 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1721/2011 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/323/20141. VED PARKASHS/o Pratap Singh R/o Kharkhoda ,tehsil Kharkhoda SonepatHaryana.....
Case Number: 1760
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MUNISH KUMAR GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3608 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/06/2012 in Appeal No. 1008/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SAROJ GROVERW/o Sh Ashok R/o H.No-2535 Urban Estate JindHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 3608
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURISPERITUS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3606 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/03/2012 in Appeal No. 315/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UHBVNLThrough its SDO City Sub Division UHBVNLSonepatHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. IS...
Case Number: 3606
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1442 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/01/2011 in Appeal No. 1623/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARISH KUMARR/o. Village BilaspurYamuna NagarHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. UHBVNLThr...
Case Number: 1442
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. M.C. TYAGI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. JURISPERITUS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3610 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 16/06/2011 in Appeal No. 678/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. VED PRAKASHS/o Shri Mam Raj, R/o Vill Post Hatwala Panipat Haryana...........Petitioner(s)Versu...
Case Number: 3610
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvnl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvnl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvnl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.