Uhbvnl
Latest Judgments
Total 1550 Consumer Court Cases Against Uhbvnl.
UHBVNL V/S Smt.Sarabjeet Kaur w/o Sh.Dara Singh
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Atul Jaiswal
Respondant Advocate Pawan Verma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 1236 of 2010. Date of institution: 24.12.2010 Date of decision: 4.11.2015Smt. Sarabjeet Kaur w/o Sh. Dara Singh age 65 years, resident of House No. 554, Friends Colony, Yamuna Nagar, Tehsil Jagadhri...
Case Number: 1236
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2015
RAM CHANDER V/S UHBVNL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.P.S.KOHLI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 703 of 2015Date of Institution: 27.08.2015Date of Decision : 03.11.2015Sub Divisional Officer, Operations, Sub Division, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Machhroli, Tehsil and District Jhaj...
Case Number: 703
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2015
KAMLESH RANI V/S UHBVNL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.S.BAIRAGI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.898 of 2015 Date of Institution:16.10.2015 Date of Decision:03.11.2015Uttar Hayana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd., Panchkula through its Managing Director.S.D.O. (OP) UHBVNL, Sub Division, Ladwa, Tehsil T...
Case Number: 898
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2016
UHBVNL V/S Sarwan singh
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate J.S manchanda
Respondant Advocate Gautam bathlla
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2015
MEHAR SINGH V/S UHBVNL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.P.S.KOHLI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 510 of 2015Date of Institution: 05.06.2015Date of Decision : 29.10.2015Sub Divisional Officer “OP” Sub Division, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Assand. Appellant-Opposite Par...
Case Number: 510
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2016
KARTAR SINGH( SINCE DECEASED) TR0UGH LR. WAZIR SINGH 2. KAPTAN SINGH 3. MUNI 4. BRIGADIER 5. PHOLWAT V/S UHBVNL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.P.S.KOHLI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.469 of 2015 Date of Institution:22.05.2015 Date of Decision: 29.10.2015S.D.O “OP”, Sub Urban Sub Division, UHBVNL, Jhajjar, District Jhajjar. …Appellant VersusKartar Singh (deceas...
Case Number: 469
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2016
11. UHBVNL GOHANA,2. SDO UHBVNL GOHANA V/S SANTOSH DEVI W/O ANOOP SINGH
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate R.L. SINGLA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.351 of 2014Instituted on: 18.12.2014 Date of order: 29.10.2015Santosh Devi wife of Anoop Singh, Chopra Colony, Gohana, tehsil Gohana, distt. Sonepat.…Complainant. Versus1. Executive Engineer, UH...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2015
1. SDO UHBVNL LTD.,2. THE XEN UHBVNL SUB DIVISION V/S 1. PROMILA,2.NISHANT,3.UMESH,4.SATWANTI W/O JAGBIR,5. JAGBIR S/O KIDARA
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate SHAKTI SINGH
Respondant Advocate MAHABIR SINGH
Case Number: 134
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-11-2015
UHBVNL V/S Parlhad
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Bubnesh Kumar Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2015
1. UHBVNL ,2. A.E.E. UHBVNL V/S NARENDER KUMAR S/O MAHABIR SINGH
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.K. KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.355 of 2014 Instituted on:23.12.2014 Date of order:26.10.2015Narender Kumar son of Mahabir Singh, r/o Gali no.7, Rishi Colony, Sonepat. …….Complainant VERSUSThe SDO UHBVN Ltd., Sub Divisio...
Case Number: 355
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvnl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvnl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvnl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.