Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 259
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Inderjeet Khokhar
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON’BLE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.CC/466 OF 2016 Instituted on : 29.11.2016 Date of order : 14.12.2016Jagbir Singh Chhikara S/o Late Umrao Singh, R/o Village Nangal Kalan District Sonepat.…Complainant.Ver...
Case Number: 466
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2016
Case Number: 187
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.D.BHATIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.674 of 2015Date of the Institution: 18.08.2015Date of Decision: 12.12.2016SDO, Sub Urban, Sub Division, UHBVNL, Narwana, District Jind. .….AppellantVersus1. Ishwar Singh S/o Rishal Singh2. Nar...
Case Number: 674
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.D.BHATIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.675 of 2015Date of the Institution: 18.08.2015Date of Decision: 12.12.2016SDO, Sub Urban, Sub Division, UHBVNL, Narwana, District Jind. .….AppellantVersusDevinder S/o Sh. Telu Ram, R/o Village...
Case Number: 675
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.P.S.KOHLI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.468 of 2015Date of the Institution: 22.05.2015Date of Decision: 05.12.2016S.D.O. “OP” Sub Division UHBVNL., Industrial Area, Distt. Sonepat. .….AppellantVersusKiran Garg W/o Ram Bab...
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
Case Number: 266
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate R.K.Kamboj
Sanjay Kumar Verma Vs. UHBVNL.CC No. 497 of 2014.Present: Sh. Sanjay Kumar complainant in person. Sh. R.K.Kamboj, Advocate, counsel for respondents. Complainant made a statement that there is some technical defect in the present complaint, so, he does not want to pursue the pre...
Case Number: 497
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate BHIM SINGH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 777 of 2016Date of Institution: 26.08.2016Date of Decision : 02.12.2016Maya Devi wife of Sh. Bhim Singh, resident of House No.1390, Sector 13, Urban Estate, Kurukshetra-136118, Haryana. Appellant-Co...
Case Number: 777
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ALKA JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.194 of 2016Date of the Institution: 08.03.2016Date of Decision: 29.11.2016SE (Ops) UHBVNL Ltd, Sonepat Division, Near I.T.I. Chowk, Kabipur, Sonepat.S.D.O. (Electrical) UHBNVL Murthal Ltd, Near Sector...
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvnl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvnl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvnl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.