Uco Bank
Latest Judgments
Total 1259 Consumer Court Cases Against Uco Bank.
RABINDRA NATH GHOSH V/S CHIEF MANAGER/BRANCH MANAGER, UCO BANK & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK SARKAR, MR. DHARMENDRA KR. VERMA & MR. SAMRAT MUKHERJEE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 112 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 23/09/2016 in Complaint No. 265/2016 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. CHIEF MANAGER/BRANCH MANAGER, UCO BANK & ANR.BAKSARA BRANCH, BAKSARA, L.M.C. SARANI, HOWRAH-71...
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Sk. Ashif Ahmed V/S Uco Bank
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Shankar Singh
Respondant Advocate In-Person.
...
Case Number: 936
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
Sk. Rahamat Ali V/S Uco Bank
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Shankar Singh
Respondant Advocate In-Person.
...
Case Number: 937
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
The Branch Manager, Uco Bank and another V/S Pramatha Nath Palit
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inMiscellaneous Application No. MA/2/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/297/20161. Pramatha Nath Palit210/5, Bidhan Sarani, P.S. - Girish Park, Kolkata - 70...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
The Chief manager/Br. Manager UCO Bank V/S Sri Rabindra Nath Ghosh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Debasis Bhandari
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Complaint Case No. CC/265/20161. Sri Rabindra Nath GhoshS/o Lt. Panchkari Ghosh, Prop., Bhabani Construction, Baksara, Ghoshpara, P.O. Baksara, Dist. Howrah - 711 110............Compl...
Case Number: 265
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2017
Manager, UCO Bank V/S Anshumaan sharma
Court Name: Kota
Appelant Advocate O.P.Joshi
Respondant Advocate Kamalnayan Saxena
Case Number: 265
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2017
Branch Manager, UCO Bank , Sagarpara Branch V/S Golam Mustafijur Rahaman
Court Name: Murshidabad
Appelant Advocate Mr. Partha Majumder
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumBerhampore, Murshidabad.Complaint Case No. CC/171/20161. Golam Mustafijur RahamanS/O- Late Neajuddin Mondal, Vill- Nabingram, PO- Sagarpara, PS-Jalangi, Pin-742306MurshidabadWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Branch Manager, UCO...
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Uco Bank and 6 others V/S Debasish Dasgupta
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/516/20161. Debasish Dasgupta26A, Satish Mukherjee Road, Kolkata - 700026............Complainant(s)Versus1. Uco Bank and 6 oth...
Case Number: 516
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2017
UCO BANK V/S SH. R D UPADHYAY
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/721/20091. SH. R D UPADHYAY CHAMBER NO. 15 M C SHEETAL WARD, LAWYER CHAMBERS COMPLEX, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, BHAGWAN DAS RAOD, NEW DELHI ...
Case Number: 721
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2017
UCO Bank V/S Harbans Lal
Court Name: Shimla
Appelant Advocate Vishal Mohan
Respondant Advocate H.P.Singh
Case Number: 263
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uco Bank in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uco Bank ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uco Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.