company-name-logo

Uber

Latest Judgments

Total 50 Consumer Court Cases Against Uber.

Chandigarh

UBER Services V/S Sonika Bhatia

Uber  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/561/2019Date of Institution: 30/05/2019Date of Decision: 04/06/2019Sonika Bhatia d/o B.N.Bhatia, R/o house No.2051, Sector 45-C, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R S U S­Uber Ser...

Case Number: 561

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 06-06-2019

Chandigarh

Mr. Amber Kapur Properties Proprietor M/s Burger Hub V/S Uber India System Private Limited

Properties   Uber  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Utsav Singh Bains, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Mavpreet Singh, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/321/2018( Date of Filing : 26 Oct 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/09/2018 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/307/2018 of District DF-II)1. Uber India System Private LimitedChandigarh...........Appellan...

Case Number: 321

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 25-06-2019

Punjab

Uber Head Office V/S Raman Kumar

Uber  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-03-2019

Maharashtra

UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PVT.LTD. V/S MR.PANKAJ RAJMACHIKAR

Uber  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2018

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2019

Chandigarh

Uber Eats V/S Shranav Katyal

Uber  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Advocate Sukhdev Singh khokher

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:307/2018Date of Institution:30.05.2018Date of Decision:17.09.20181. Shranav Katyal son of Sh.Navneet Katyal r/o # 1189, Sector 8-c, First Floor, Chandigarh2. Gurpreet Singh son of Sohan Singh r/o V...

Case Number: 307

|

Date of Filing: 31-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 26-09-2018

Chandigarh

Uber V/S Sh. Krishan M. Vohra

Uber  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Satyajeet Singh Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:899 of 2017Date of Institution:24.11.2017Date of Decision:22.02.2018Sh.Krishan M. Vohra son of Sh.Devi Dayal Vohra, resident of H.No.671, Sector 7, Panchkula, Haryana. …..Complainant...

Case Number: 899

|

Date of Filing: 24-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 20-03-2018

Chandigarh

Uber V/S Jasjit Singh

Uber  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Mohit Goyal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/610/2017Date of Institution:30/08/2017Date of Decision:06/02/2018Jasjit Singh r/o Flat No.1633, Sector 51, Chandigarh…..ComplainantV E R S U SUber, Plot No.88, Near Hotel Sky, Industrial...

Case Number: 610

|

Date of Filing: 30-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-02-2018

Chandigarh

Uber Cabs V/S Mohit Bansal

Uber  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Abhinandan Pandhi Adv. & Ashutosh Aggarwal Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated :02/05/2017ORDER Sh. Abhinandan Pandhi, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file afresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant...

Case Number: 374

|

Date of Filing: 26-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 04-05-2017

Chandigarh

Uber India Systems Private Limited V/S Dhawal Bhandari

Uber  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Dated : 20/04/2016ORDER This case has been taken up today, because 19th April, 2016 was declared holiday on account of Mahavir Jayanti. Sh. Dhawal Bhandari, complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately: - “Due to technical defect, I do not press this co...

Case Number: 242

|

Date of Filing: 08-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-12-2016

Karnataka

To Director Uber India V/S Rohit Sharma

Uber  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate

Completeis Dismissedoff Settled Out of Forum...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 08-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 01-08-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uber in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uber ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Uber under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.