company-name-logo

Uber

Latest Judgments

Total 50 Consumer Court Cases Against Uber.

West Bengal

Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. V/S Partha Roy Choudhury.

Uber  

Court Name: Kolkata-III(South)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027Complaint Case No. CC/209/2019( Date of Filing : 01 Apr 2019 )1. Partha Roy Choudhury.S/o Mr Subrata Roy Choudhury, residing at 8/1 Sarkarhat Lane, Sarsuna, P.s.-...

Case Number: 209

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 29-06-2022

Madhya Pradesh

UBER INDIA V/S NILIMP DADHICH

Uber  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate MANISH VERMA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 19-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 20-06-2022

Maharashtra

M/S UBER PARTNER SEVA KENDRA KURLA V/S NISHI RAKESH DOSHI

Uber  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate ADV M L DHONE

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai Suburban AdditionalAdmin Bldg., 3rd floor, Nr. Chetana College, Bandra-East, Mumbai-51Complaint Case No. CC/197/2021( Date of Filing : 11 Nov 2021 )1. NISHI RAKESH DOSHIR/O 1002 SIDDHESH JYOTI F WING BALRAM STREET GRANT ROAD...

Case Number: 197

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2021

|

Date of Upload: 20-05-2022

Telangana

UBER India Systems Private Limited, V/S Rajkumar Gummi

Uber  

Court Name: Hyderabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate M.Sravan Kumar

Case Number: 154

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2021

|

Date of Upload: 28-04-2022

Punjab

Uber Cabs V/S Mohit Bansal

Uber  

Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali

Appelant Advocate Abhinandan Pandhi

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 405

|

Date of Filing: 12-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 05-01-2022

Maharashtra

Uber India Systems Private Limited V/S Pankaj Rajmachikar Son of Satish Rajmachikar

Uber  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane

Appelant Advocate Nilesh Parte

Respondant Advocate

THANE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONRoom no. 428 and 429, Konkan Bhavan Annex Building, 4th Floor,C.B.D. Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614Complaint Case No. CC/17/134( Date of Filing : 15 Jul 2017 )1. Pankaj Rajmachikar Son of Satish Rajmachikar1st floor, F...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 15-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2022

Maharashtra

UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED V/S MR.SHADAB KHAN

Uber  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Thane

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

THANE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONRoom no. 428 and 429, Konkan Bhavan Annex Building, 4th Floor,C.B.D. Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614Complaint Case No. CC/21/100( Date of Filing : 25 May 2021 )1. MR.SHADAB KHAN87, KAMAL TV CENTRE, GURU NANAK NAGAR, LBS...

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 25-05-2021

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2021

Rajasthan

Uber India Technology Pvt ltd V/S Rohit Pithisariya

Uber  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Shyam Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 582

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2021

Chandigarh

Uber Services V/S Sonika Bhatia

Uber  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHAppeal No.24 of 2020Date of Institution29.01.2020Date of Decision17.03.2021Sonika Bhatia aged 42 years D/o Late Sh. B.N.Bhatia, R/o H.No.2051, Sector 45-C, Chandigarh.…..Appellant/ComplainantVersusUber...

Case Number: 24

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2021

Punjab

Raman Kumar Soni V/S Uber Taxi Services & Another

Uber  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vipul Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 266

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2020

|

Date of Upload: 28-01-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uber in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uber ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Uber under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.