Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Shri R.M.Deshmukh
Respondant Advocate Pradeep Gavli
Complaint Case No. CC/199/20101. Mr.P.M.G.VargheseRoshan 2st, Plus Colony, MulundMumbai-80Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Shriram Transport Finance Co.LtdDalamal Tower 221, Nariman PointMumbai-21Maharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORAB...
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2015
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Smt. Kavitha
Respondant Advocate Sri. G.R. Ashok
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAICHUR, SATH KACHERI, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, RAICHUR-584101, KARNATAKA STATE.Ph.No. 08532-233006.Complaint Case No. CC/11/901. Abdul Nabi S/o. Raja Sab, RaichurAge: 40 years, Occ: Driver cum owner, R/o. Arab Mohalla, Kurdi village, Tq. ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. BHARTI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/06/1196(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/05/232 of District Yavatmal)1. M/S SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANC...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 68 Of 20121. ANSH ENTERPRISES.SHOP NO.4 WAGLE TRUST BUILDING, 362, J. S. MARG, ADJACENT MUMBAI-2MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BRIHAN MUMBAI ELECTRIC SUPPLY & TRANSPORT uNDERTAKINGDIVISIONAL eNGINEEER, CUSTOMER CARE C,WARD, VIDYUT BUILDING, PATHAK WADI,...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Guntur
Appelant Advocate Y.V.RAMESH BABU
Respondant Advocate S.A.KHADAR
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGUNTURComplaint Case No. CC/11/1761. T.JYOTSNAW/O.VENKATA RAO H.No:5-471-9 NEAR SADINENI CHOUDROID SCHOOL BEHIND REKHA NURSING HOME CHILAKALURIPET(P) GUNTURANDHRAPREDESH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE Co.Ltd.,Rep by its...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate Nitin Bhunne
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/5131. M/s.Siddharth Trading Co., A Proprietory Firm, Mr.Shib Shankar Ghosh101, Vardhaman Industrial Complex, L.B.S.Marg, Gokul Nagar, Thane(w)-400601............Complainant(s)Versus1. Vinit Transport Service, A Proprietory Firm, Through Mr.Suresh Rajaram ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Execution Application No. EA/11/1281. Anand Laxminarayan Chilberi.13/14, Konda Nagar, Akkalkot Road, Solapur............Appellant(s)Versus1. Transport Corporation India (TCI) Ltd.Solapur Road, Bale, Tq. Solapur............Respon...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/83/20121. GADHADHARAN.P3/604, MANIPURAM LANE, NADAKKAVU, KOZHIKODE PIN 673011............Complainant(s)Versus1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICERCIVIL STATION , KOZHIKODE.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., PRESIDENTHONOURABLE MRS...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate ADV. SOURA GHOSH
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 69 Of 20121. MR. HARISH JOSHIM/S. RAJESH ENTERPRISES, DIVISION 109 SHEIKH MEMON STREET, 2/25 SAHIWALA BUILDING ZAVERI BAZAR, MUMBAI-2MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NARANJI PERNJI TRANSPORT CO,.NARANJI PERANJI TRANSPORT CO. 67, CHAKALA STREET, MUMBAI3MUM...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Transport in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Transport ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Transport under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.