Transport
Latest Judgments
Total 7796 Consumer Court Cases Against Transport.
Br. Manager, Suri Branch, Shriram Transport V/S Ujjwal Khan,
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate Sanjit Kr. Acharya
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., V/S Ganapati Roy, S/o Haradhan Roy,
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate Kajal Kr. Chatterjee
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Delhi UP Madhya Pradesh Transport Co. (West), V/S M/s Proton Pharma,
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 283 of 2013 1. M/s Proton Pharma,SCO 228, Top Floor, Sector 40/D, Chandigarh, through its Manager Mr. Raj Narayan Yadav. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 10 Jun 2013 ORDER DISTR...
Case Number: 283
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. Manikala singh, The Manager, Branch Incharge, Shri Ram Transport Finance Company Limited, Kongare V/S Sri A.Dharma Reddy, S/o. Rangaiah @ Chengaiah, Aged about 46 Years, Lorry Driver Cum Owner, Residing at D.No. 15-987, Project Veedhi, srikalahasthi Mandal, Chittoor, Dist.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Smt. Manne Hari Babu
Respondant Advocate Mr.Vakkanti Narasimha Rao - R1 and R2
FA No: 874 Of 2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/09/2012 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/19/2012 of District Chittoor-I)1. Sri A.Dharma Reddy, S/o. Rangaiah @ Chengaiah, Aged about 46 Years, Lorry Driver Cum Owner, Residing at D.No. 15-987, Project Veedhi, srikalahasthi Mandal, ...
Case Number: 874
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SHREERAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD V/S MANGILAL
Court Name: Mandsaur
Appelant Advocate VINOD SONI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2016
Smt. Mala Tewari V/S Shriram Transport Co. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Atanu Banerjee
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 59
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2022
M/s National INssurance Co.Ltd V/S M/s. Adhunik Transport Organisation
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Ashok M. Sarogi
Respondant Advocate M.V kini & Co.
Complaint Case No. CC/09/601. M/s. Adhunik Transport Organisation201 Abhay Steel House Baroda Street,Mumbai-400 009Maharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s National INssurance Co.Ltd2nd Floor Sterling Cinema Bldg, 65, Mraban Street FortMumbai-400 001Maharastra............O...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PUNEET KUMAR V/S DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J.S. BHASIN & MRS. R. PRIYA
Respondant Advocate MR. SANJEEV MEHTA & MRS. ARUNA MEHTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1317 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 19/02/2013 in Appeal No. 342/2012 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/2447/20131. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATIONTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, SCINDIA HOUSENEW DELHI..........
Case Number: 1317
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2013
Regional Transport Officer V/S Jaison Thomas
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamComplaint Case No. CC/99/20131. Jaison ThomasChirathadathil House, Muttuchira P.O., KottayamKottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Regional Transport OfficerKottayam, Pin - 686 002KottayamKerala2. Sub Regional Transport OfficerS...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MILAP TRANSPORT V/S BALKRASHNA
Court Name: Mandsaur
Appelant Advocate SANJAY RATHORE
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Transport in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Transport ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Transport under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.