Trackon Courier
Latest Judgments
Total 67 Consumer Court Cases Against Trackon Courier.
Jaspal Singh V/S M/s Trackon Courier Private Limited & others
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma & Hoshiar Singh
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1402 of 2013 Date of Institution: 18.12.2013 Date of Decision: 12.01.20161. M/s Track on Courier Private Limited, C-143, ...
Case Number: 1402
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2016
Sh. Vijender Bhushan Arora. V/S The Chairman, M/s Trackon Courier Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Vinay Mehta.
Respondant Advocate Mr. Sat Prakash.
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2015
The Trackon Courier Private Limited V/S M/s Kapoor Optical
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.:218 of 2015Date of Institution:07.09.2015Date of Decision:09.09.2015M/s Kapoor Optical Co., Shop No.2-3, Sector 22-D, Chandigarh, through its partner Anil Kapoor.……Appellant/Complainant.Ve...
Case Number: 218
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2015
M/S Trackon Courier V/S Karamvir
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate K.K jangra
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2015
Harpal Singh and anr. V/S Trackon Courier Pvt. Ltd.
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma & Hoshiar Singh
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No.320 of 2013 Date of Institution: 21.03.2013 Date of Decision: 21.08.2015M/s Track on Courier...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2015
Neera Mehta V/S M/s Trackon Courier Pvt. Ltd.
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2015
Trackon Courier Ltd. V/S Sukhwinder Singh
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/14/4621. Sukhwinder SinghR/o D-6/94, Vikas nagar, Khandwala Chowk, Chheharta, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Trackon Courier Ltd...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2015
TRACKON COURIER PVT. LTD. V/S TRILOK SHARMA
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: Bareilly-I
Appelant Advocate MANOJ BAJPAI
Respondant Advocate P.K. SAXENA
Case Number: 195
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2015
Sh. Amit Bhatnagar. V/S M/s Trackon Courier Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Gaurav Sharma.
Respondant Advocate Mr. Jagdish Thakur.
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2015
Trackon Courier V/S Parveen Kumar
Courier Trackon Courier Trackon
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH.First Appeal No. 1899 of 2011 Date of Institution: 26.12.2011. Date of Decision: 16.02.2015.Parveen Kumar son of Ratan Lal, aged 30 year...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Trackon Courier in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Trackon Courier ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Trackon Courier under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.