Tpwodl
Latest Judgments
Total 43 Consumer Court Cases Against Tpwodl.
The SDO, TPWODL V/S CHANDRAMANI SAMAL
Court Name: Sundargarh II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sri Samir Pradhan
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONSUNDARGARH-II, ROURKELAComplaint Case No. CC/15/2023( Date of Filing : 03 Feb 2023 )1. CHANDRAMANI SAMALS/o- Late R.K. Samal, Resident of Block Road, Kuarmunda, At/Po- Kuarmunda, Ps- Birmitrapur, Dist- Sundargarh, OdishaSundargarhOdi...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2023
|
Date of Upload: 13-11-2024
Junior Engineer, (Electrical) Lathikata, TPWODL V/S LABANYENDU PAL
Court Name: Sundargarh II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONSUNDARGARH-II, ROURKELAComplaint Case No. CC/174/2023( Date of Filing : 01 Aug 2023 )1. LABANYENDU PALS/o- Late Santosh Kumar Pal, Resident of Upper Balijodi, Po- Rourkela-16, Ps- Raghunathpalli, Dist-Sundargarh, OdishaSundargarhOdis...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2023
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2024
S.D.O.(Electrical) WESCO,Now TPWODL V/S Netranand Birganthia S/O- Late Machindta Birhanthia
Court Name: Jharsuguda
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate B.B. Barai
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2023
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2024
The Sub-Divisional Officer, TPWODL V/S Seikh Abdul Kalam
Court Name: Sambalpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sk. Abdul Salam
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, SambalpurNear, SBI Main Branch, SambalpurUploaded by Office AssistanceComplaint Case No. CC/59/2024( Date of Filing : 17 Feb 2024 )1. Seikh Abdul KalamS/O-Sk. Abdul Samad, R/O-At-Sonapali, PO-Dhankauda Ps-Dhanupali, Dist-Sambalpur-...
Case Number: 59
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2024
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2024
Executive Engineer TPWODL ,Behermal V/S Sri, Samir Tiwari S/O- Biseswar Tiwari
Court Name: Jharsuguda
Appelant Advocate LAK Saideo
Respondant Advocate B.B. Barai
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2021
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2024
(1) Electrical Sectional Officer TPWODL Electrical Section III, Bar-garh, V/S GANESH BEHERA
Court Name: Bargarh
Appelant Advocate SRI G.MEHER WITH ASSOCIATES.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BARGARH (ODISHA)AT. COURT PREMISES,PO.PS.DISTRICT. BARGARH PIN. 768028Complaint Case No. CC/56/2023( Date of Filing : 09 May 2023 )1. GANESH BEHERAaged about 62 (sixty two) years, son of Late Benudhar Behera, resident of Back side ...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2023
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2024
1. Executive Engineer Sambalpur Electrical Division TPWODL V/S Abtar Singh
Court Name: Sambalpur
Appelant Advocate Sri. R.P. Nanda, Adv. & Associates
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, SambalpurNear, SBI Main Branch, SambalpurUploaded by Office AssistanceComplaint Case No. CC/166/2023( Date of Filing : 09 Oct 2023 )1. Abtar SinghAged about 54 years, W/O-Late Dalbir Singh, R/O-Jamada, Kadampada Hirakud, PO/Ps-Hira...
Case Number: 166
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2023
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2024
1. S.D.O, TPWODL , Titilagarh V/S Sri Raghunath Rath, Aged about 53 years, S/O- Late nabin Kumar Rath
Court Name: Balangir
Appelant Advocate Asit Kumar Sarangi and Others
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM. BOLANGIRODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/18/2024( Date of Filing : 04 Mar 2024 )1. Sri Raghunath Rath, Aged about 53 years, S/O- Late nabin Kumar RathR/O At/Po:- TitilagarhBolangirOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. S.D.O, TPWODL , Ti...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2024
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2024
1. Junior Engineer, (Electrical) TPWODL V/S Jayalal Panigrahi ,aged about 55 years
Court Name: Kalahandi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KALAHANDINEAR TV CENTRE PADA, BHAWANIPATANA, KALAHANDI ODISHA, PIN 766001Complaint Case No. CC/65/2023( Date of Filing : 14 Nov 2023 )1. Jayalal Panigrahi ,aged about 55 yearsS/O-late Brundaban Panigrahi Ro/At-Talpadar,Po-Padampur,...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2023
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2024
Executive Engineer(Electrial) TPWODL V/S Shakil Akhtar S/O- Akhtar Husain
Court Name: Jharsuguda
Appelant Advocate Abdul Zalil
Respondant Advocate B.N.Dutta
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2022
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2024
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tpwodl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tpwodl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tpwodl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.