company-name-logo

Toyota

Latest Judgments

Total 571 Consumer Court Cases Against Toyota.

Haryana

TOYOTA INDIA. V/S TARUN AGGARWAL.

Toyota  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate VARUN CHAWLA.

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No:229 of 2015Date of Institution:19.10.2015Date of Decision:30.11.2016Tarun Aggarwal s/o Sh.Arun Aggarwal, R/o H.No.345, Sukhna Enclave, Village Kansal, Mohali, Punjab-160055.….Complainan...

Case Number: 229

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2016

NCDRC

TIRATH SINGH OBEROI V/S M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS P LTD & ANR

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN SINGHANIA

Respondant Advocate MR. PRADEEP GUPTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2944 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 07/05/2008 in Appeal No. 841/2007 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS P LTD & ANRPlot No. 1, Bidadi Industrial Area, Ramnagar TalukBa...

Case Number: 2944

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2008

|

Date of Upload: 08-12-2016

Kerala

TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTD V/S U.I.JOHN,MANAGING PARTNER,MARTHOMA GRANITES

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate P.YADHUKUMAR

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/13/7031. U.I.JOHN,MANAGING PARTNER,MARTHOMA GRANITESEDAVETTY P.O.,THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI-685588...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTDREPRESENTED BY ITS CEO,HEAD OFFICE,PLOT NO.1,BIDADI...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 11-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-12-2016

Maharashtra

Toyota Kirloskar V/S Ekanath Kacheshwar Dighole

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: Nashik

Appelant Advocate G. V. Tadage

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 472

|

Date of Filing: 12-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2016

Punjab

Amandeep Singh Grewal V/S M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt. Ltd.

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 460

|

Date of Filing: 29-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Andhra Pradesh

1. The Managing Director, Toyota Kirloskar Motors, V/S Smt. Mandava Indiara,

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dr. Ch. Divakar Babu Secretary, Consumers Guidance Society

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 186

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2016

West Bengal

Pasang Tshering Sherpa V/S Topsel Toyota

Toyota  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Mr. Debasish De Mr. Debasish Das

Respondant Advocate Mr. Prasanta Banerjee.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/330/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/02/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/30/2014 of District Darjeeling)1. Topsel ToyotaRegd. & Head Office at 25, Ganesh Cha...

Case Number: 330

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2016

Chandigarh

The Manager Toyota Kirloskar Motors V/S Savita Kumari

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Deepak Goyal Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated :03/10/2016ORDER As per office report, amount of Rs.74012/- has been deposited in the account of President. Sh. Deepak Goyal, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the execution application that he withdraws this execution application with the...

Case Number: 122

|

Date of Filing: 19-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2016

Chandigarh

Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd. V/S Ashok Kumar

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Deep Goel Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated :30/09/2016ORDER None has turned up on behalf of complainant / decree holder. Case has been called several times since morning. Accordingly, the application under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is dismissed in default. Certified copy of this order be commun...

Case Number: 139

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2016

Uttar Pradesh

SUNNY TOYOTA V/S SUNITA TRIVEDI

Toyota  

Court Name: Lucknow-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 384

|

Date of Filing: 01-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 20-10-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Toyota in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Toyota ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Toyota under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.