Toyota
Latest Judgments
Total 571 Consumer Court Cases Against Toyota.
PASANG TSHERING SHERPA & ANR. V/S TOPSEL TOYOTA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT SHARMA & MR. DIPESH SINHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 156 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 18/10/2016 in Appeal No. 330/2015 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. TOPSEL TOYOTAA UNIT OF TOPSEL PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS WORKSHOP AT NH-31, PARIBAHAN NAGAR, MATI...
Case Number: 156
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2017
TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS PVT. LTD. V/S NAVEEN KUMAR GARG
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate DIVAY SARUP
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.190 of 2015Date of the Institution: 29.10.2015Date of Decision: 08.02.2017Naveen Kumar Garg S/o Sh.Ram Kumar Garg, aged 37 years, R/o H.NO.1655 Urban Estate-2, Hisar at present R/o H.No.259, Sector 9-11,...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2017
THE MANAGER,AMANA TOYOTA V/S ANISH C S
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate ADV.V P BIMALDAS
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/329/20151. ANISH C SCHIRAYATH HO, BILATHIKULAM ROAD, ERANHIPPALAM PO, CALICUT...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MANAGER,AMANA TOYOTAV. P. K MOTORS PVT. LTD, N. H 17, CHERUVANNUR, KOLATHARA PO, CALIC...
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2017
S.K.Bajpai V/S VICON Toyota Vicon Automobiles & Anr.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shri Rajesh Pandey
Respondant Advocate Shri R.K.Bhawnani
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2017
MONGHABHAI GULABBHAI NAIK V/S TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PVT LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V P NANAVATY
Respondant Advocate vilay bhatiya
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2017
Toyota Kirloskar Motors Limited V/S Saurabh Aggarwal
Court Name: Moga
Appelant Advocate Sh. Navin Kumar Palta
Respondant Advocate Sh. Kanwar Pahul Singh
THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MOGA. CC No. 142 of 2016 Instituted on: 24.08.2016 Decided on: 28.12.2016Saurabh Aggarwal age 35 years s/o Yudhishthar Aggarwal, r/o Ward no.6, Zira, Now resident of H.No. 30, Green Lane, Backside Geeta Bhawan, Moga, Tehsil and ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2017
Satyam Toyota V/S Inder Nath
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Jain
Respondant Advocate Sh. B.R. Arora
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 138/20131. Inder Nath Inder Nath Chugh, Manager Adarsh High School, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar............Complainant(s)Versus1. Satyam ToyotaSatyam Toyota Bangur Cinema, Hissar Road, Rohtak ...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-04-2017
Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd and another V/S Sri.H.C.Bharath Raj
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate Sri.Kurumbaiah M.B.
Respondant Advocate Sri.SVS
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/582/20151. Sri.H.C.Bharath RajH.C.Bharath Raj, S/o Late H.S.Chikkadevaiah, ...
Case Number: 582
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
HIMMAT SINGH V/S TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.R.BANSAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No. 113 of 2016Date of Institution: 30.11.2016Date of Decision: 07.12.2016M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd., Registered Office & Works, Plot No.1, Bidadi Industrial Area, Ramanagara Distri...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Radiant Toyota V/S Karamjit Singh
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Swarn Singh Ratol
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 423 Instituted on: 13.06.2016 Decided on: 02.12.2016Karamjit Singh son of Sh. Chuhar Singh, resident of H.No.24, Part-I, Village Dhabbi Gujjran, Tehsil Patran, Distt. Sangrur. …Complainant Versus1. Radiant ...
Case Number: 423
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Toyota in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Toyota ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Toyota under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.