company-name-logo

Toyota

Latest Judgments

Total 571 Consumer Court Cases Against Toyota.

Telangana

Toyota India V/S Dr. Ather Moin Rasheeda

Toyota   Ather  

Court Name: Hyderabad

Appelant Advocate Ms. Mohd. Shakeel

Respondant Advocate P.M.Gopala Krishna

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM I HYDERABAD(9th Floor, Chandravihar Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001)Complaint Case No. CC/497/2017( Date of Filing : 21 Nov 2017 )1. Dr. Ather Moin RasheedaRo. 2.3.725, Z T Nagar, Amberpet, Hydrabad...............

Case Number: 497

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Toyota Auto Mobile V/S Neeraj Kumar Newatiya

Toyota   Mobile  

Court Name: Varanasi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 30-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2019

West Bengal

Smt. Shyamali Dutta V/S Topsel Toyota

Toyota  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Debasish De, Ms. Debanjana De, Mr. Debasis Das

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/171/2018( Date of Filing : 20 Feb 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/02/2016 in Case No. CC/666/2014 of District Howrah)1. Topsel ToyotaRegd. & Head office at 25, ...

Case Number: 171

|

Date of Filing: 20-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-09-2019

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

THE MANAGER, TOYOTA SHARAYU AUTO LINK PVT LTD, V/S VITTHAL BAPURAO GODSE

Toyota  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S S JOSHI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2019

Chandigarh

Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Kulpreet Kaur Prop. SGS Marketing India Inc

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

ORDER Sh. S. R. Bansal, Advocate, Counsel for judgment debtor No.2 has filed reply the execution application, which is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to Sh. Swaranjeet Singh Sodhi, husband/representative of Mrs. Kulpreet Kaur, Prop. SGS Marketing India Inc. &...

Case Number: 176

|

Date of Filing: 20-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 11-09-2019

Madhya Pradesh

RAJPAL TOYOTA V/S MALA VIJAY

Toyota  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 25-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2019

Himachal Pradesh

Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. V/S Sh. Amit Rana.

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Ravinder Singh Chandel.

Respondant Advocate Mr. Peeyush Verma.

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2019

Maharashtra

MR.SAMBHAJI G.PATIL PROPRIETOR OF ARJUN ENTERPRISES V/S TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA LTD.

Toyota   Toyota Financial Services  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate ADV.MASKEY

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 01-11-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Rajendra Toyota V/S Ritesh Jaiswal S/o Shri Krishna Kumar Jaiswal

Toyota  

Court Name: Jaunpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 69

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 23-07-2019

Kerala

MANAGING DIRECTOR TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR V/S PRADEEP N S

Toyota   Kirloskar  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate KAMALESHWARAM S MANIKANTAN NAIR

Respondant Advocate

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION SISUVIHARLANE VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NUMBER 144/16JUDGMENT DATED ;24.06.2019(Appeal filed against the order in CC.No.23/16 of the CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram)PRESENTSRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH : JUDICIAL MEMBERSMT.BEENA KUMAR...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 29-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Toyota in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Toyota ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Toyota under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.