Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/266/20091. GULATI TEXTILE FAZALGANJ KANPUR NAGAR BEFORE: For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERCASE WILL BE DISPOSED OFF...
Case Number: 266
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate K.N.Nimavat
Respondant Advocate M N Mehta
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2015
United India Insurance Textile Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. A.K. DE
Respondant Advocate MR. VARUN BHANDARI & MR. ABHISHEK RAI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3834 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/07/2013 in Appeal No. 124/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.2863 EAST MOHAN NAGAR,AMRITSARPUNJAB...........Petitioner(s)Versu...
Case Number: 3834
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2014
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/343/20141. Balwinder Kumar S/o Bakshi RamH.No.7,Moh.Kot Sadiq,PO Basti GuzanJalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 343
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate Maibam N. Singh
Respondant Advocate Vats Gupta & Co. Advocates & Solicitors
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 12 OF 20071. M/s. Shree Vadera Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd. Through Director Shri. K.C. Jain Resident of A-251, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur Rajasthan...........Complainant(s)Versus1. State Bank of India, Head Office...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARCHANA PISE
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/1061. GANESH TEXTILES,THROUGH PROPRITOR, MR. BHIMRAO SHRIRANG YADAV, R/O PLOT NO.E-2 KADEGAON, SHIVAJINAGAR MIDC, KADEGAON, DIST. SANGALI............Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARCHANA PISE
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/1061. GANESH TEXTILES,THROUGH PROPRITOR, MR. BHIMRAO SHRIRANG YADAV, R/O PLOT NO.E-2 KADEGAON, SHIVAJINAGAR MIDC, KADEGAON, DIST. SANGALI............Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARCHANA PISE
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/1061. GANESH TEXTILES,THROUGH PROPRITOR, MR. BHIMRAO SHRIRANG YADAV, R/O PLOT NO.E-2 KADEGAON, SHIVAJINAGAR MIDC, KADEGAON, DIST. SANGALI............Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARCHANA PISE
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/1061. GANESH TEXTILES,THROUGH PROPRITOR, MR. BHIMRAO SHRIRANG YADAV, R/O PLOT NO.E-2 KADEGAON, SHIVAJINAGAR MIDC, KADEGAON, DIST. SANGALI............Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RACHANA PISE
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/1061. GANESH TEXTILES,THROUGH PROPRITOR, MR. BHIMRAO SHRIRANG YADAV, R/O PLOT NO.E-2 KADEGAON, SHIVAJINAGAR MIDC, KADEGAON, DIST. SANGALI............Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Textile in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Textile ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Textile under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.