company-name-logo

Tele Communication

Latest Judgments

Total 91 Consumer Court Cases Against Tele Communication.

Kerala

The Proprietor,Univercell Tele communication india (P)ltd V/S Shinu Thomas

Tele Communication  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. cc/13/557( Date of Filing : 31 Dec 2013 )1. Shinu Thomasneyatinkara,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Proprietor,Univercell Tele communication india (P)ltd mg Road,Tvpm.....

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2018

Uttarakhand

Singhal Tele Communication V/S Pooja Nautiyal

Tele Communication  

Court Name: Hardwar

Appelant Advocate Suhdakar Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 303

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 14-05-2018

Andhra Pradesh

Univercell Tele Communication (I) Private Limited V/S Mr. Aditya Vardhan

Tele Communication  

Court Name: Visakhapatnam-II

Appelant Advocate K. Ashok Kumar

Respondant Advocate Exparte

Case Number: 204

|

Date of Filing: 12-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 25-02-2017

Tamil Nadu

M/s Universal Tele Communication India (P) Ltd., Rep by The Manager V/S J.Kalaiyarasan

Tele Communication  

Court Name: Tiruchirapplli

Appelant Advocate M.Muthusamy

Respondant Advocate R.Gopi

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 17-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 07-12-2016

Orissa

Reliance Tele Communication Ltd., Navi Mumbai V/S Smt. Sulata Rani Barik, aged about 42 years

Reliance   Tele Communication   Mumbai  

Court Name: Baleshwar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Sj. Bikash Mohan Das & Others

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BALASOREAT- COLLECTORATE CAMPUS, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001Complaint Case No. CC/31/20161. Smt. Sulata Rani Barik, aged about 42 yearsW/o. Sri Bansidhar Barik, At- Hatigaon, P.O- Bamada (Rupsa), Dist- Balasore. Odisha...........Complain...

Case Number: 31

|

Date of Filing: 18-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2016

Tamil Nadu

The Sale Manager, Universel Cell, Tele Communication india Ltd V/S M/s.Kulavanan

Tele Communication  

Court Name: South Chennai

Appelant Advocate M/s.A.Venkatesh

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)Complaint Case No. CC/458/20141. M/s.KulavananNo.5/264, Vettiyakaadu St,Vedharanyam Taluak, Nagapattinam DistNagapattinamTamil Nadu...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Sale Manager, Universel Cell, Tele Communication ind...

Case Number: 458

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 31-05-2016

Tamil Nadu

M/s.Univercell Tele Communication India P Ltd V/S R.Balakrishnan

Tele Communication  

Court Name: South Chennai

Appelant Advocate Party in Persion

Respondant Advocate R.Gobi

...

Case Number: 206

|

Date of Filing: 18-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 12-08-2015

Andhra Pradesh

MEMMO GLOBAL TELE COMMUNICATION PVT.LTD., V/S POLAMARASETTI GUNA PRANAY,MINOR REP.BY HIS FATHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN P.GANESH

Tele Communication  

Court Name: Visakhapatnam

Appelant Advocate VENU SUBRAHMANYESWARA RAO

Respondant Advocate EXP

Case Number: 29

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Tamil Nadu

The Branch Manager Univercell Tele Communication India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Mrs.K.P.Dimple siva priya

Tele Communication  

Court Name: Theni

Appelant Advocate A.Krishnamoorthy Bsc.Bl.,

Respondant Advocate R.Gobi

Case Number: 55

|

Date of Filing: 16-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-06-2015

Orissa

RELIANCE TELE COMMUNICATION Ltd. V/S Sri Purna Chandra Nayak , S/O Late Rabindra Chandra Nayak

Reliance   Tele Communication  

Court Name: Bhadrak

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMBHADRAKComplaint Case No. CC/125/2013( Date of Filing : 25 Oct 2013 )1. Sri Purna Chandra Nayak , S/O Late Rabindra Chandra NayakVill/Po- R.N.Betara , Ps- Bhadrak (R) , Dist- Bhadrak...........Complainant(s)Versus1. RELIANCE TELE COMMUNIC...

Case Number: 125

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-11-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tele Communication in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tele Communication ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Tele Communication under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.