Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MONICA SHARMA,
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 27 OF 2013 WITH IA/929/20131. Mrs. MANJU BANSAL & 3 ORS.,D/o Shri Rai Aggarwal, R/o Flat No. 66, Bank Vihar, Road No. 42, Pitampura,DELHI. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JEEVAN PRAKASH, Advocate
Respondant Advocate MS. KANIKA AGNIHOTRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 331 OF 2013 IN CC/78/20121. DEEPAK KUMAR JAIN & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INTIME PROMOTERS (P) LTD.)...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION N...
Case Number: 331
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JEEVAN PRAKASH, Advocate
Respondant Advocate MS. KANIKA AGNIHOTRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 331 OF 2013 IN CC/78/20121. DEEPAK KUMAR JAIN & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INTIME PROMOTERS (P) LTD.)...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION N...
Case Number: 332
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JEEVAN PRAKASH, Advocate
Respondant Advocate MS. KANIKA AGNIHOTRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 331 OF 2013 IN CC/78/20121. DEEPAK KUMAR JAIN & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INTIME PROMOTERS (P) LTD.)...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION N...
Case Number: 333
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JEEVAN PRAKASH, Advocate
Respondant Advocate MS. KANIKA AGNIHOTRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 331 OF 2013 IN CC/78/20121. DEEPAK KUMAR JAIN & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INTIME PROMOTERS (P) LTD.)...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION N...
Case Number: 334
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. YOGESH KUMAR DAHIYA & MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1134 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/08/2012 in Appeal No. 213/2011 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/2045/2013,IA/2046/20131. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REP RESENTATIVE,...
Case Number: 1134
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHAY ANAND & MR. R.K. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2585 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/03/2012 in Appeal No. 324/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ROSHANI DEVIW/o Sh S.P Jain R/o House No-1333 Sector-14,Sonepat,tehsilSonepatHaryana..............
Case Number: 2585
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. YOGESH DAHIYA & MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT GUPTA & MR. VARUN TYAGI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 397 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/08/2012 in Appeal No. 115/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, 7 GORUND FLOOR, CONNAUGHT CIRCUS,...
Case Number: 397
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv (C)
Respondant Advocate Sh. S.K.Monga, Adv.
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 27 of 2010 1. Manish GuptaS/o Late SH. Ramesh Gupta, aged about 42 years, R/o # 6, Vikas Vihar, Ambala City ...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL MALHOTRA & MS. SONALI MALHOTRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 227 OF 20111. AMITABH NANGIA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S. K. NAIK, ME...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.