Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision : 29.04.2015Complaint Case No.300/2011Ashok Goyal36-37, Naya Bazar,New Delhi-110043 …ComplainantVERSUS M/s TDI Infrastructure Ltd. 9, Kasturba Gandhi Marg New...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-05-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate MANOJ KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.17 of 2015 Instituted on:20.01.2015 Date of order:07.05.2015Sarita Jain wife of Sunil Jain, r/o Door No.61, 5th Floor, Mahavir Niketan, Krishantpa Agraharam Street, Kundipope, Chennai-79. ...Complainant...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate V.K. GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
Execution petition No. EA 99/05.08.2013Complainants No. 257 OF 2011Date of Order : 01.05.2013Sarla Gupta R/o House No. 907, Sector 15 Sonepat, Haryana…………………Complainant/ApplicantVersusM/s T.D.I. Infrastructure Ltd., through its Aut...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate ASHOK PANDIT
Respondant Advocate TAJINDER RATHEE
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.99 of 2014 Instituted on:16.04.2014 Date of order:15.04.2015Dr Monika Gupta wife of Dr Vivek Mangla, resident of H.No.B-8/11, Sector 5, Rohni, Delhi.85. ...Complainant. Versus1.TDI Infrastructure Ltd.,...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate REJENDER SINGH
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.205 of 2014 Instituted on:22.08.2014. Date of order:18.05.2015Rajender Singh Nandal son of Udey Singh, resident of 47, Vashundhra Apartment, Sector 9, Rohini, Delhi/VPO Bohar, district Rohtak. ...Complai...
Case Number: 205
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate ANIL MALIK
Respondant Advocate
Execution petition No. EA24/31.01.2013Complainants No. 448 OF 2009Date of order : 01.04.2010Anil Mailk S/o Sh. K.L. Malik R/o House No. 258, Sector-4 Rohtak, Haryana…………………Complainant/ApplicantVersusM/S T.D.I. Infrastructure Pvt. L...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MAHESH SINGH,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 251 OF 20141. Shri SUSHIL KUMAR SAGAR & ANR.,R/o 1, Govind Nagar,SONIPAT - 132001............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & 4 ORS.,(Formerly Intime Promoters (P) Ltd.), Regd. Office: ...
Case Number: 251
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3379 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 15/04/2014 in Appeal No. 908/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.9 KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVENEW DELHI - 1...
Case Number: 3379
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2342 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 15/04/2014 in Appeal No. 909/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.9 KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVENEW DELH...
Case Number: 2342
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MEENAKSHI MIDHA
Respondant Advocate M/S. SKV ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3933 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 25/10/2013 in Appeal No. 740/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SAMEER CHAWLA & ANR.S/O SHRI SUBHASH CHAWLA, R/O 149 GUJRAWALA TOWN, PART-IIDELHI - 1100092. MRS....
Case Number: 3933
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.