Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.K.MONGA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 609 of 2016Date of Institution: 06.07.2016Date of Decision : 04.08.2016M/s TDI Infrastructure Limited (formerly known as Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Limited) having its registered office ...
Case Number: 609
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate M.L. SEHGAL
Respondant Advocate Virender Rathi
Case Number: 256
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate J.B. BHARDAWAJ
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.185 of 2014 Instituted on:28.07.2014 Date of order:19.07.20161.Ms. Preeti daughter of Balwan Singh, 2.Balwan Singh son of Hoshiar Singh, both residents of Gali NO.1, Jeewan Vihar, Murthal road, Sonepat. ...
Case Number: 185
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate MANNU MALIK
Respondant Advocate Virender Tyagi
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.293 of 2014 Instituted on:04.11.2014 Date of order:18.05.2016Rajiv Kumar son of Dharam Chand r/o H.No.145, Mohanpura, Sonepat. ...Complainant. Versus1.Intime Promoters Pvt. Ltd., 9 Kasturba Gandhi Marg,...
Case Number: 293
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate MAHENDER MALIK
Respondant Advocate VIRENDER TYAGI
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.326 of 2014 Instituted on:01.12.2014 Date of order:28.04.2016Harinder Malhotra son of Om Parkash Malhotra, r/o H.No.108, Jeewan Nagar, Sonepat. ...Complainant. Versus1.M/s TDI Infrastructure Ltd., Vanda...
Case Number: 326
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: Delhi(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Argument: 01.04.2016Date of Decision: 04.04.2016First Appeal-159/2016 In the Matter of: Poonam Wife of Shri Pramod Kumar Resident of B-38, Gali No. 1, Sadat Pur Extn. Karawal ...
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VISHAL NEHRA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1073 of 2015Date of Institution: 16.12.2015Date of Decision : 03.03.2016Smt. Kamal Kanta wife of Sh. Surender Saluja, resident of House No.1243, Sector 14, Sonepat, Haryana. Appellant-ComplainantVer...
Case Number: 1073
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RECEIVED FROM NCDRC,NEW DELHI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Remand Appeal No : 32 of 2016First Appeal No. 672 of 2012Date of Institution: 30.05.2012Date of Decision : 17.02.2016TDI Infrastructure Private Limited formerly known as In Time Promoters Private Limited, 9 Kasturba ...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 11.02.2016 Date of Decision: 16.02.2016Complaint Case No. 1010/2015In the matter of:Raj KishoreG-26/445, Sector 3Rohini, Delhi-110085...........ComplainantVersusM/...
Case Number: 1010
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeals No: 369 & 747 of 2015Date of Institution: 23.04.2015 & 10.09.2015Date of Decision: 29.01.2016Appeal No.369 of 20151. TDI Infrastructure Limited, Registered Office UG Floor, Vandana Building, 11,...
Case Number: 369
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.