Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIKAS DEEP
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 774 of 2017Date of Institution: 05.12.2017Date of Decision: 30.10.2018Nidhi Jain wife of Shri Vikas Deep Jain, resident of # 2325, Sector-15 (11), Sonepat, Haryana....ComplainantVersusM/s TDI Infrastru...
Case Number: 774
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANJEEV CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 29.10.2018First Appeal No.431/2018Arising out of the order dated 06.06.2018 passed in Complaint Case No. 27-A/2013 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (...
Case Number: 431
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2018
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Surender Malik
Respondant Advocate Tajinder Rathee
Case Number: 372
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate DIWAN S. ADLAKHA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1553 of 2017Date of Institution: 15.12.2017Date of Decision : 04.10.20181. Sanjay Jaitly son of Dev Raj Sharma2. Vandna Jaitly wife of Sanjay Jaitly Both resident of TP-117, Mayura Enclave, Pitampur...
Case Number: 1553
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 03.10.2018Date of Decision : 09.10.2018 COMPLAINT NO.234/2014In the matter of:Kamlesh Sachdeva,8/41 Geeta Colony,P/o. Gandhi Nagar,Delhi-110031. .........Complaina...
Case Number: 234
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PRADEEP SOLATH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA AT PANCHKULAComplaint Case No.496 of 2017Date of Institution:16.08.2017Date of Decision:27.09.2018Manju Sharma W/o Sh. Vikas Sharma, R/o House No.261, Sector-23, Sonepat, Haryana.…Complainant Vs.TDI Infrastructure Ltd. ...
Case Number: 496
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-10-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC.No-401/2011 Dated: O R D E RThe OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the shop exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs, i.e. Rs.21,40,000/- approx. (basic sale pric...
Case Number: 401
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUSHEEL GAUTAM
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 562 of 2018Date of Institution: 02.05.2018Date of Decision : 11.09.2018Deepak Kumar son of Jasmer Singh, resident of House No.31, Subhash Colony, Panipat. Appellant-ComplainantVersus1. TDI Infrastru...
Case Number: 562
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
-+IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision: 27.08.2018Complaint Case No.338/2011In the matter of:Mrs. Tara Devi w/o. Mr. Krishan ChandBN-5, West Sharlimar Bagh,New Delhi:Mrs. Aparna w/o. Sushil Manglani s/o...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUKTI BODH
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing: 09.08.2018 Date of decision:14.08.2018Complaint No. 116/2017IN THE MATTER OF:Mr. Kinshuk Priyadarshi@ Kinshuk SrivastavaS/o Late Sh. S.K. SrivastavaC-712, De...
Case Number: 116
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.